Give nicer note when a member redeclaration has or lacks 'const'
llvm-svn: 141555
diff --git a/clang/test/SemaCXX/nested-name-spec.cpp b/clang/test/SemaCXX/nested-name-spec.cpp
index 8e73c3e..e13030c 100644
--- a/clang/test/SemaCXX/nested-name-spec.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/SemaCXX/nested-name-spec.cpp
@@ -27,10 +27,10 @@
static int A::C::cx2 = 17; // expected-error{{'static' can}}
class C2 {
- void m(); // expected-note{{member declaration nearly matches}}
+ void m(); // expected-note{{member declaration does not match because it is not const qualified}}
void f(const int& parm); // expected-note{{type of 1st parameter of member declaration does not match definition ('const int &' vs 'int')}}
- void f(int) const; // expected-note{{member declaration nearly matches}}
+ void f(int) const; // expected-note{{member declaration does not match because it is const qualified}}
void f(float);
int x;
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@
class Operators {
- Operators operator+(const Operators&) const; // expected-note{{member declaration nearly matches}}
+ Operators operator+(const Operators&) const; // expected-note{{member declaration does not match because it is const qualified}}
operator bool();
};