Use a DenseMap instead of an std::map for the value numbering. This reduces the time to optimize lencod on a PPC Debug build from ~300s to ~140s.
llvm-svn: 37668
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/GVNPRE.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/GVNPRE.cpp
index 61bc367..e261d78 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/GVNPRE.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/GVNPRE.cpp
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
#include "llvm/Function.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/Dominators.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/PostDominators.h"
+#include "llvm/ADT/DenseMap.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/DepthFirstIterator.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/Statistic.h"
#include "llvm/Support/CFG.h"
@@ -78,7 +79,7 @@
};
private:
- std::map<Value*, uint32_t> valueNumbering;
+ DenseMap<Value*, uint32_t> valueNumbering;
std::map<Expression, uint32_t> expressionNumbering;
std::set<Expression> maximalExpressions;
@@ -217,7 +218,7 @@
uint32_t ValueTable::lookup_or_add(Value* V) {
maximalValues.insert(V);
- std::map<Value*, uint32_t>::iterator VI = valueNumbering.find(V);
+ DenseMap<Value*, uint32_t>::iterator VI = valueNumbering.find(V);
if (VI != valueNumbering.end())
return VI->second;
@@ -255,7 +256,7 @@
}
uint32_t ValueTable::lookup(Value* V) {
- std::map<Value*, uint32_t>::iterator VI = valueNumbering.find(V);
+ DenseMap<Value*, uint32_t>::iterator VI = valueNumbering.find(V);
if (VI != valueNumbering.end())
return VI->second;
else
@@ -265,7 +266,7 @@
}
void ValueTable::add(Value* V, uint32_t num) {
- std::map<Value*, uint32_t>::iterator VI = valueNumbering.find(V);
+ DenseMap<Value*, uint32_t>::iterator VI = valueNumbering.find(V);
if (VI != valueNumbering.end())
valueNumbering.erase(VI);
valueNumbering.insert(std::make_pair(V, num));