doesSetDirectiveSuppressesReloc -> doesSetDirectiveSuppressReloc, the
former is grammatically incorrect.
llvm-svn: 273100
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86MCInstLower.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86MCInstLower.cpp
index 86bae3e..4fc7ae5 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86MCInstLower.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86MCInstLower.cpp
@@ -245,7 +245,7 @@
MCSymbolRefExpr::create(MF.getPICBaseSymbol(), Ctx),
Ctx);
if (MO.isJTI()) {
- assert(MAI.doesSetDirectiveSuppressesReloc());
+ assert(MAI.doesSetDirectiveSuppressReloc());
// If .set directive is supported, use it to reduce the number of
// relocations the assembler will generate for differences between
// local labels. This is only safe when the symbols are in the same