Implement implicit capture for lambda expressions.
Still left: explicit captures in lambdas need to cause implicit capture, and I need to take a look at the diagnostics for some cases.
llvm-svn: 149718
diff --git a/clang/test/CXX/expr/expr.prim/expr.prim.lambda/blocks.cpp b/clang/test/CXX/expr/expr.prim/expr.prim.lambda/blocks.cpp
index faf686d..2ed738d 100644
--- a/clang/test/CXX/expr/expr.prim/expr.prim.lambda/blocks.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/CXX/expr/expr.prim/expr.prim.lambda/blocks.cpp
@@ -5,7 +5,6 @@
(void)[var] { }; // expected-error{{__block variable 'var' cannot be captured in a lambda}} \
// expected-error{{lambda expressions are not supported yet}}
- // FIXME: this should produce the same error as above
- (void)[=] { var = 17; }; // expected-error{{reference to local variable 'var' declared in enclosed function 'block_capture_errors'}} \
+ (void)[=] { var = 17; }; // expected-error{{__block variable 'var' cannot be captured in a lambda}} \
// expected-error{{lambda expressions are not supported yet}}
}