Don't construct two CFGs just to run -Wuninitialized. While this causes new warnings to be flagged under -Wconditional-uninitialized, this is something we
can improve over time.
llvm-svn: 127802
diff --git a/clang/test/SemaCXX/uninit-variables-conditional.cpp b/clang/test/SemaCXX/uninit-variables-conditional.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1a82285
--- /dev/null
+++ b/clang/test/SemaCXX/uninit-variables-conditional.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -Wconditional-uninitialized -fsyntax-only %s -verify
+
+class Foo {
+public:
+ Foo();
+ ~Foo();
+ operator bool();
+};
+
+int bar();
+int baz();
+int init(double *);
+
+// This case flags a false positive under -Wconditional-uninitialized because
+// the destructor in Foo fouls about the minor bit of path-sensitivity in
+// -Wuninitialized.
+double test() {
+ double x; // expected-note {{variable 'x' is declared here}} expected-note{{add initialization to silence this warning}}
+ if (bar() || baz() || Foo() || init(&x)) {
+ return x; // expected-warning {{variable 'x' is possibly uninitialized when used here}}
+ }
+ return 1.0;
+}