diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp
index d94cb0d..7c6af57 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp
@@ -169,16 +169,16 @@
   MemberOfUnknownSpecialization = false;
 
   switch (Name.getKind()) {
-  case UnqualifiedId::IK_Identifier:
+  case UnqualifiedIdKind::IK_Identifier:
     TName = DeclarationName(Name.Identifier);
     break;
 
-  case UnqualifiedId::IK_OperatorFunctionId:
+  case UnqualifiedIdKind::IK_OperatorFunctionId:
     TName = Context.DeclarationNames.getCXXOperatorName(
                                               Name.OperatorFunctionId.Operator);
     break;
 
-  case UnqualifiedId::IK_LiteralOperatorId:
+  case UnqualifiedIdKind::IK_LiteralOperatorId:
     TName = Context.DeclarationNames.getCXXLiteralOperatorName(Name.Identifier);
     break;
 
@@ -3557,7 +3557,7 @@
     TemplateParameterList *TemplateParams, StorageClass SC,
     bool IsPartialSpecialization) {
   // D must be variable template id.
-  assert(D.getName().getKind() == UnqualifiedId::IK_TemplateId &&
+  assert(D.getName().getKind() == UnqualifiedIdKind::IK_TemplateId &&
          "Variable template specialization is declared with a template it.");
 
   TemplateIdAnnotation *TemplateId = D.getName().TemplateId;
@@ -4084,8 +4084,8 @@
       // We found something; return it.
       auto *LookupRD = dyn_cast<CXXRecordDecl>(LookupCtx);
       if (!AllowInjectedClassName && SS.isSet() && LookupRD &&
-          Name.getKind() == UnqualifiedId::IK_Identifier && Name.Identifier &&
-          LookupRD->getIdentifier() == Name.Identifier) {
+          Name.getKind() == UnqualifiedIdKind::IK_Identifier &&
+          Name.Identifier && LookupRD->getIdentifier() == Name.Identifier) {
         // C++14 [class.qual]p2:
         //   In a lookup in which function names are not ignored and the
         //   nested-name-specifier nominates a class C, if the name specified
@@ -4107,17 +4107,17 @@
   NestedNameSpecifier *Qualifier = SS.getScopeRep();
 
   switch (Name.getKind()) {
-  case UnqualifiedId::IK_Identifier:
+  case UnqualifiedIdKind::IK_Identifier:
     Result = TemplateTy::make(Context.getDependentTemplateName(Qualifier,
                                                               Name.Identifier));
     return TNK_Dependent_template_name;
 
-  case UnqualifiedId::IK_OperatorFunctionId:
+  case UnqualifiedIdKind::IK_OperatorFunctionId:
     Result = TemplateTy::make(Context.getDependentTemplateName(Qualifier,
                                              Name.OperatorFunctionId.Operator));
     return TNK_Function_template;
 
-  case UnqualifiedId::IK_LiteralOperatorId:
+  case UnqualifiedIdKind::IK_LiteralOperatorId:
     llvm_unreachable("literal operator id cannot have a dependent scope");
 
   default:
@@ -9044,7 +9044,7 @@
         return true;
       }
 
-      if (D.getName().getKind() != UnqualifiedId::IK_TemplateId) {
+      if (D.getName().getKind() != UnqualifiedIdKind::IK_TemplateId) {
         // C++1y [temp.explicit]p3:
         //   If the explicit instantiation is for a variable, the unqualified-id
         //   in the declaration shall be a template-id.
@@ -9126,7 +9126,7 @@
   // argument list into our AST format.
   bool HasExplicitTemplateArgs = false;
   TemplateArgumentListInfo TemplateArgs;
-  if (D.getName().getKind() == UnqualifiedId::IK_TemplateId) {
+  if (D.getName().getKind() == UnqualifiedIdKind::IK_TemplateId) {
     TemplateArgs = makeTemplateArgumentListInfo(*this, *D.getName().TemplateId);
     HasExplicitTemplateArgs = true;
   }
@@ -9292,7 +9292,7 @@
   //
   // C++98 has the same restriction, just worded differently.
   FunctionTemplateDecl *FunTmpl = Specialization->getPrimaryTemplate();
-  if (D.getName().getKind() != UnqualifiedId::IK_TemplateId && !FunTmpl &&
+  if (D.getName().getKind() != UnqualifiedIdKind::IK_TemplateId && !FunTmpl &&
       D.getCXXScopeSpec().isSet() &&
       !ScopeSpecifierHasTemplateId(D.getCXXScopeSpec()))
     Diag(D.getIdentifierLoc(),