Change 'method X in protocol not implemented' warning to include the name of the protocol.
This removes an extra "note:", which wasn't really all that more useful
and overall reduces the diagnostic spew for this case.
llvm-svn: 197207
diff --git a/clang/test/SemaObjC/protocols-suppress-conformance.m b/clang/test/SemaObjC/protocols-suppress-conformance.m
index 3349f7f..f62b285 100644
--- a/clang/test/SemaObjC/protocols-suppress-conformance.m
+++ b/clang/test/SemaObjC/protocols-suppress-conformance.m
@@ -18,10 +18,10 @@
// This class subclasses ClassA (which adopts 'Protocol'),
// but does not provide the needed implementation.
-@interface ClassB : ClassA <Protocol> // expected-note {{required for direct or indirect protocol 'Protocol'}}
+@interface ClassB : ClassA <Protocol>
@end
-@implementation ClassB // expected-warning {{method 'theBestOfTimes' in protocol not implemented}}
+@implementation ClassB // expected-warning {{method 'theBestOfTimes' in protocol 'Protocol' not implemented}}
@end
// Test that inherited protocols do not get the explicit conformance requirement.
@@ -37,10 +37,10 @@
@interface ClassC <Inherited>
@end
-@interface ClassD : ClassC <Derived> // expected-note {{required for direct or indirect protocol 'Derived'}}
+@interface ClassD : ClassC <Derived>
@end
-@implementation ClassD // expected-warning {{method 'foulIsFair' in protocol not implemented}}
+@implementation ClassD // expected-warning {{method 'foulIsFair' in protocol 'Derived' not implemented}}
@end
// Test that the attribute is used correctly.