name change: isPow2DivCheap -> isPow2SDivCheap
isPow2DivCheap
That name doesn't specify signed or unsigned.
Lazy as I am, I eventually read the function and variable comments. It turns out that this is strictly about signed div. But I discovered that the comments are wrong:
srl/add/sra
is not the general sequence for signed integer division by power-of-2. We need one more 'sra':
sra/srl/add/sra
That's the sequence produced in DAGCombiner. The first 'sra' may be removed when dividing by exactly '2', but that's a special case.
This patch corrects the comments, changes the name of the flag bit, and changes the name of the accessor methods.
No functional change intended.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5010
llvm-svn: 216237
diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp
index 5fd9bf3..a74afe1 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp
@@ -2082,7 +2082,7 @@
(-N1C->getAPIntValue()).isPowerOf2())) {
// If dividing by powers of two is cheap, then don't perform the following
// fold.
- if (TLI.isPow2DivCheap())
+ if (TLI.isPow2SDivCheap())
return SDValue();
// Target-specific implementation of sdiv x, pow2.
diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/TargetLoweringBase.cpp b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/TargetLoweringBase.cpp
index f768650..11b6571 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/TargetLoweringBase.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/TargetLoweringBase.cpp
@@ -701,7 +701,7 @@
HasMultipleConditionRegisters = false;
HasExtractBitsInsn = false;
IntDivIsCheap = false;
- Pow2DivIsCheap = false;
+ Pow2SDivIsCheap = false;
JumpIsExpensive = false;
PredictableSelectIsExpensive = false;
MaskAndBranchFoldingIsLegal = false;