fix formatting; NFC
llvm-svn: 263342
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyCFG.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyCFG.cpp
index 4d24cc9..1eff0ba 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyCFG.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyCFG.cpp
@@ -404,7 +404,7 @@
/// Try to set the current value used for the comparison, it succeeds only if
/// it wasn't set before or if the new value is the same as the old one
bool setValueOnce(Value *NewVal) {
- if(CompValue && CompValue != NewVal) return false;
+ if (CompValue && CompValue != NewVal) return false;
CompValue = NewVal;
return (CompValue != nullptr);
}
@@ -1216,7 +1216,7 @@
if (!SI)
SI = cast<SelectInst>
(Builder.CreateSelect(BI->getCondition(), BB1V, BB2V,
- BB1V->getName()+"."+BB2V->getName()));
+ BB1V->getName() + "." + BB2V->getName()));
// Make the PHI node use the select for all incoming values for BB1/BB2
for (unsigned i = 0, e = PN->getNumIncomingValues(); i != e; ++i)
@@ -1878,10 +1878,10 @@
isa<BinaryOperator>(IfCond)))
return false;
- // If we all PHI nodes are promotable, check to make sure that all
- // instructions in the predecessor blocks can be promoted as well. If
- // not, we won't be able to get rid of the control flow, so it's not
- // worth promoting to select instructions.
+ // If all PHI nodes are promotable, check to make sure that all instructions
+ // in the predecessor blocks can be promoted as well. If not, we won't be able
+ // to get rid of the control flow, so it's not worth promoting to select
+ // instructions.
BasicBlock *DomBlock = nullptr;
BasicBlock *IfBlock1 = PN->getIncomingBlock(0);
BasicBlock *IfBlock2 = PN->getIncomingBlock(1);
@@ -1892,8 +1892,8 @@
for (BasicBlock::iterator I = IfBlock1->begin();!isa<TerminatorInst>(I);++I)
if (!AggressiveInsts.count(&*I) && !isa<DbgInfoIntrinsic>(I)) {
// This is not an aggressive instruction that we can promote.
- // Because of this, we won't be able to get rid of the control
- // flow, so the xform is not worth it.
+ // Because of this, we won't be able to get rid of the control flow, so
+ // the xform is not worth it.
return false;
}
}
@@ -1905,8 +1905,8 @@
for (BasicBlock::iterator I = IfBlock2->begin();!isa<TerminatorInst>(I);++I)
if (!AggressiveInsts.count(&*I) && !isa<DbgInfoIntrinsic>(I)) {
// This is not an aggressive instruction that we can promote.
- // Because of this, we won't be able to get rid of the control
- // flow, so the xform is not worth it.
+ // Because of this, we won't be able to get rid of the control flow, so
+ // the xform is not worth it.
return false;
}
}
@@ -2114,7 +2114,7 @@
if (!Cond || (!isa<CmpInst>(Cond) && !isa<BinaryOperator>(Cond)) ||
Cond->getParent() != BB || !Cond->hasOneUse())
- return false;
+ return false;
// Make sure the instruction after the condition is the cond branch.
BasicBlock::iterator CondIt = ++Cond->getIterator();
@@ -2886,7 +2886,7 @@
if (BIV != PBIV) {
// Insert a select in PBI to pick the right value.
Value *NV = cast<SelectInst>
- (Builder.CreateSelect(PBICond, PBIV, BIV, PBIV->getName()+".mux"));
+ (Builder.CreateSelect(PBICond, PBIV, BIV, PBIV->getName() + ".mux"));
PN->setIncomingValue(PBBIdx, NV);
}
}