Initial revision

llvm-svn: 2
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/ConstantProp.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/ConstantProp.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..eef5a03
--- /dev/null
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/ConstantProp.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,239 @@
+//===- ConstantProp.cpp - Code to perform Constant Propogation ------------===//
+//
+// This file implements constant propogation and merging:
+//
+// Specifically, this:
+//   * Folds multiple identical constants in the constant pool together
+//     Note that if one is named and the other is not, that the result gets the
+//     original name.
+//   * Converts instructions like "add int %1, %2" into a direct def of %3 in
+//     the constant pool
+//   * Converts conditional branches on a constant boolean value into direct
+//     branches.
+//   * Converts phi nodes with one incoming def to the incoming def directly
+//   . Converts switch statements with one entry into a test & conditional
+//     branch
+//   . Converts switches on constant values into an unconditional branch.
+//
+// Notice that:
+//   * This pass has a habit of making definitions be dead.  It is a good idea
+//     to to run a DCE pass sometime after running this pass.
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#include "llvm/Module.h"
+#include "llvm/Method.h"
+#include "llvm/BasicBlock.h"
+#include "llvm/iTerminators.h"
+#include "llvm/iOther.h"
+#include "llvm/ConstPoolVals.h"
+#include "llvm/ConstantPool.h"
+#include "llvm/Opt/AllOpts.h"
+#include "llvm/Opt/ConstantHandling.h"
+
+// Merge identical constant values in the constant pool.
+// 
+// TODO: We can do better than this simplistic N^2 algorithm...
+//
+static bool MergeConstantPoolReferences(ConstantPool &CP) {
+  bool Modified = false;
+  for (ConstantPool::plane_iterator PI = CP.begin(); PI != CP.end(); ++PI) {
+    for (ConstantPool::PlaneType::iterator I = (*PI)->begin(); 
+	 I != (*PI)->end(); I++) {
+      ConstPoolVal *C = *I;
+
+      ConstantPool::PlaneType::iterator J = I;
+      for (++J; J != (*PI)->end(); J++) {
+	if (C->equals(*J)) {
+	  Modified = true;
+	  // Okay we know that *I == *J.  So now we need to make all uses of *I
+	  // point to *J.
+	  //
+	  C->replaceAllUsesWith(*J);
+
+	  (*PI)->remove(I); // Remove C from constant pool...
+	  
+	  if (C->hasName() && !(*J)->hasName())  // The merged constant inherits
+	    (*J)->setName(C->getName());         // the old name...
+	  
+	  delete C;                              // Delete the constant itself.
+	  break;  // Break out of inner for loop
+	}
+      }
+    }
+  }
+  return Modified;
+}
+
+inline static bool 
+ConstantFoldUnaryInst(Method *M, Method::inst_iterator &DI,
+                      UnaryOperator *Op, ConstPoolVal *D) {
+  ConstPoolVal *ReplaceWith = 0;
+
+  switch (Op->getInstType()) {
+  case Instruction::Not:  ReplaceWith = !*D; break;
+  case Instruction::Neg:  ReplaceWith = -*D; break;
+  }
+
+  if (!ReplaceWith) return false;   // Nothing new to change...
+
+
+  // Add the new value to the constant pool...
+  M->getConstantPool().insert(ReplaceWith);
+  
+  // Replaces all of the uses of a variable with uses of the constant.
+  Op->replaceAllUsesWith(ReplaceWith);
+  
+  // Remove the operator from the list of definitions...
+  Op->getParent()->getInstList().remove(DI.getInstructionIterator());
+  
+  // The new constant inherits the old name of the operator...
+  if (Op->hasName()) ReplaceWith->setName(Op->getName());
+  
+  // Delete the operator now...
+  delete Op;
+  return true;
+}
+
+inline static bool 
+ConstantFoldBinaryInst(Method *M, Method::inst_iterator &DI,
+		       BinaryOperator *Op,
+		       ConstPoolVal *D1, ConstPoolVal *D2) {
+  ConstPoolVal *ReplaceWith = 0;
+
+  switch (Op->getInstType()) {
+  case Instruction::Add:     ReplaceWith = *D1 + *D2; break;
+  case Instruction::Sub:     ReplaceWith = *D1 - *D2; break;
+
+  case Instruction::SetEQ:   ReplaceWith = *D1 == *D2; break;
+  case Instruction::SetNE:   ReplaceWith = *D1 != *D2; break;
+  case Instruction::SetLE:   ReplaceWith = *D1 <= *D2; break;
+  case Instruction::SetGE:   ReplaceWith = *D1 >= *D2; break;
+  case Instruction::SetLT:   ReplaceWith = *D1 <  *D2; break;
+  case Instruction::SetGT:   ReplaceWith = *D1 >  *D2; break;
+  }
+
+  if (!ReplaceWith) return false;   // Nothing new to change...
+
+  // Add the new value to the constant pool...
+  M->getConstantPool().insert(ReplaceWith);
+  
+  // Replaces all of the uses of a variable with uses of the constant.
+  Op->replaceAllUsesWith(ReplaceWith);
+  
+  // Remove the operator from the list of definitions...
+  Op->getParent()->getInstList().remove(DI.getInstructionIterator());
+  
+  // The new constant inherits the old name of the operator...
+  if (Op->hasName()) ReplaceWith->setName(Op->getName());
+  
+  // Delete the operator now...
+  delete Op;
+  return true;
+}
+
+inline static bool ConstantFoldTerminator(TerminatorInst *T) {
+  // Branch - See if we are conditional jumping on constant
+  if (T->getInstType() == Instruction::Br) {
+    BranchInst *BI = (BranchInst*)T;
+    if (!BI->isUnconditional() &&              // Are we branching on constant?
+        BI->getOperand(2)->getValueType() == Value::ConstantVal) {
+      // YES.  Change to unconditional branch...
+      ConstPoolBool *Cond = (ConstPoolBool*)BI->getOperand(2);
+      Value *Destination = BI->getOperand(Cond->getValue() ? 0 : 1);
+
+      BI->setOperand(0, Destination);  // Set the unconditional destination
+      BI->setOperand(1, 0);            // Clear the conditional destination
+      BI->setOperand(2, 0);            // Clear the condition...
+      return true;
+    }
+  }
+  return false;
+}
+
+// ConstantFoldInstruction - If an instruction references constants, try to fold
+// them together...
+//
+inline static bool 
+ConstantFoldInstruction(Method *M, Method::inst_iterator &II) {
+  Instruction *Inst = *II;
+  if (Inst->isBinaryOp()) {
+    Value *D1, *D2;
+    if (((D1 = Inst->getOperand(0))->getValueType() == Value::ConstantVal) &
+        ((D2 = Inst->getOperand(1))->getValueType() == Value::ConstantVal))
+      return ConstantFoldBinaryInst(M, II, (BinaryOperator*)Inst, 
+                                    (ConstPoolVal*)D1, (ConstPoolVal*)D2);
+
+  } else if (Inst->isUnaryOp()) {
+    Value *D;
+    if ((D = Inst->getOperand(0))->getValueType() == Value::ConstantVal)
+      return ConstantFoldUnaryInst(M, II, (UnaryOperator*)Inst, 
+                                   (ConstPoolVal*)D);
+  } else if (Inst->isTerminator()) {
+    return ConstantFoldTerminator((TerminatorInst*)Inst);
+
+  } else if (Inst->getInstType() == Instruction::PHINode) {
+    PHINode *PN = (PHINode*)Inst; // If it's a PHI node and only has one operand
+                                  // Then replace it directly with that operand.
+    assert(PN->getOperand(0) && "PHI Node must have at least one operand!");
+    if (PN->getOperand(1) == 0) {       // If the PHI Node has exactly 1 operand
+      Value *V = PN->getOperand(0);
+      PN->replaceAllUsesWith(V);                 // Replace all uses of this PHI
+                                                 // Unlink from basic block
+      PN->getParent()->getInstList().remove(II.getInstructionIterator());
+      if (PN->hasName()) V->setName(PN->getName()); // Inherit PHINode name
+      delete PN;                                 // Finally, delete the node...
+      return true;
+    }
+  }
+  return false;
+}
+
+// DoConstPropPass - Propogate constants and do constant folding on instructions
+// this returns true if something was changed, false if nothing was changed.
+//
+static bool DoConstPropPass(Method *M) {
+  bool SomethingChanged = false;
+
+#if 1
+  Method::inst_iterator It = M->inst_begin();
+  while (It != M->inst_end())
+    if (ConstantFoldInstruction(M, It)) {
+      SomethingChanged = true;  // If returned true, iter is already incremented
+
+      // Incrementing the iterator in an unchecked manner could mess up the
+      // internals of 'It'.  To make sure everything is happy, tell it we might
+      // have broken it.
+      It.resyncInstructionIterator();
+    } else {
+      ++It;
+    }
+#else
+  Method::BasicBlocksType::iterator BBIt = M->getBasicBlocks().begin();
+  for (; BBIt != M->getBasicBlocks().end(); BBIt++) {
+    BasicBlock *BB = *BBIt;
+
+    BasicBlock::InstListType::iterator DI = BB->getInstList().begin();
+    for (; DI != BB->getInstList().end(); DI++) 
+      SomethingChanged |= ConstantFoldInstruction(M, DI);
+  }
+#endif
+  return SomethingChanged;
+}
+
+
+// returns true on failure, false on success...
+//
+bool DoConstantPropogation(Method *M) {
+  bool Modified = false;
+
+  // Fold constants until we make no progress...
+  while (DoConstPropPass(M)) Modified = true;
+
+  // Merge identical constants last: this is important because we may have just
+  // introduced constants that already exist!
+  //
+  Modified |= MergeConstantPoolReferences(M->getConstantPool());
+
+  return Modified;
+}
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/DCE.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/DCE.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..797edf5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/DCE.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,193 @@
+//===- DCE.cpp - Code to perform dead code elimination --------------------===//
+//
+// This file implements dead code elimination and basic block merging.
+//
+// Specifically, this:
+//   * removes definitions with no uses (including unused constants)
+//   * removes basic blocks with no predecessors
+//   * merges a basic block into its predecessor if there is only one and the
+//     predecessor only has one successor.
+//
+// TODO: This should REALLY be recursive instead of iterative.  Right now, we 
+// scan linearly through values, removing unused ones as we go.  The problem is
+// that this may cause other earlier values to become unused.  To make sure that
+// we get them all, we iterate until things stop changing.  Instead, when 
+// removing a value, recheck all of its operands to see if they are now unused.
+// Piece of cake, and more efficient as well.
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#include "llvm/Module.h"
+#include "llvm/Method.h"
+#include "llvm/BasicBlock.h"
+#include "llvm/iTerminators.h"
+#include "llvm/Opt/AllOpts.h"
+
+struct ConstPoolDCE { 
+  enum { EndOffs = 0 };
+  static bool isDCEable(const Value *) { return true; } 
+};
+
+struct BasicBlockDCE {
+  enum { EndOffs = 1 };
+  static bool isDCEable(const Instruction *I) {
+    return !I->hasSideEffects();
+  }
+};
+
+template<class ValueSubclass, class ItemParentType, class DCEController>
+static bool RemoveUnusedDefs(ValueHolder<ValueSubclass, ItemParentType> &Vals, 
+			     DCEController DCEControl) {
+  bool Changed = false;
+  typedef ValueHolder<ValueSubclass, ItemParentType> Container;
+
+  int Offset = DCEController::EndOffs;
+  for (Container::iterator DI = Vals.begin(); DI != Vals.end()-Offset; ) {
+    // Look for un"used" definitions...
+    if ((*DI)->use_empty() && DCEController::isDCEable(*DI)) {
+      // Bye bye
+      delete Vals.remove(DI);
+      Changed = true;
+    } else {
+      DI++;
+    }
+  }
+  return Changed;
+}
+
+
+bool DoRemoveUnusedConstants(SymTabValue *S) {
+  bool Changed = false;
+  ConstantPool &CP = S->getConstantPool();
+  for (ConstantPool::plane_iterator PI = CP.begin(); PI != CP.end(); ++PI)
+    Changed |= RemoveUnusedDefs(**PI, ConstPoolDCE());
+  return Changed;
+}
+
+
+static void ReplaceUsesWithConstant(Instruction *I) {
+  // Get the method level constant pool
+  ConstantPool &CP = I->getParent()->getParent()->getConstantPool();
+
+  ConstPoolVal *CPV = 0;
+  ConstantPool::PlaneType *P;
+  if (!CP.getPlane(I->getType(), P)) {  // Does plane exist?
+    // Yes, is it empty?
+    if (!P->empty()) CPV = P->front();
+  }
+
+  if (CPV == 0) { // We don't have an existing constant to reuse.  Just add one.
+    CPV = ConstPoolVal::getNullConstant(I->getType());  // Create a new constant
+
+    // Add the new value to the constant pool...
+    CP.insert(CPV);
+  }
+  
+  // Make all users of this instruction reference the constant instead
+  I->replaceAllUsesWith(CPV);
+}
+
+static bool DoDCEPass(Method *M) {
+  Method::BasicBlocksType::iterator BBIt;
+  Method::BasicBlocksType &BBs = M->getBasicBlocks();
+  bool Changed = false;
+
+  // Loop through now and remove instructions that have no uses...
+  for (BBIt = BBs.begin(); BBIt != BBs.end(); BBIt++)
+    Changed |= RemoveUnusedDefs((*BBIt)->getInstList(), BasicBlockDCE());
+
+  // Scan through and remove basic blocks that have no predecessors (except,
+  // of course, the first one.  :)  (so skip first block)
+  //
+  for (BBIt = BBs.begin(), ++BBIt; BBIt != BBs.end(); BBIt++) {
+    BasicBlock *BB = *BBIt;
+    assert(BB->getTerminator() && 
+	   "Degenerate basic block encountered!");  // Empty bb???
+
+    if (BB->pred_begin() == BB->pred_end() &&
+	!BB->hasConstantPoolReferences()) {
+
+      while (!BB->getInstList().empty()) {
+	Instruction *I = BB->getInstList().front();
+	// If this instruction is used, replace uses with an arbitrary
+	// constant value.  Because control flow can't get here, we don't care
+	// what we replace the value with.
+	if (!I->use_empty()) ReplaceUsesWithConstant(I);
+
+	// Remove the instruction from the basic block
+	BasicBlock::InstListType::iterator f = BB->getInstList().begin();
+	delete BB->getInstList().remove(f);
+      }
+
+      delete BBs.remove(BBIt);
+      ++BBIt;  // remove puts use on the previous block, we want the next one
+      Changed = true;
+    }
+  }
+
+  // Loop through an merge basic blocks into their predecessor if there is only
+  // one, and if there is only one successor of the predecessor.
+  //
+  for (BBIt = BBs.begin(); BBIt != BBs.end(); BBIt++) {
+    BasicBlock *BB = *BBIt;
+
+    // Is there exactly one predecessor to this block?
+    BasicBlock::pred_iterator PI(BB->pred_begin());
+    if (PI != BB->pred_end() && ++PI == BB->pred_end() && 
+	!BB->hasConstantPoolReferences()) {
+      BasicBlock *Pred = *BB->pred_begin();
+      TerminatorInst *Term = Pred->getTerminator();
+      if (Term == 0) continue; // Err... malformed basic block!
+
+      // Is it an unconditional branch?
+      if (Term->getInstType() != Instruction::Br ||
+          !((BranchInst*)Term)->isUnconditional())
+        continue;  // Nope, maybe next time...
+
+      Changed = true;
+
+      // Make all branches to the predecessor now point to the successor...
+      Pred->replaceAllUsesWith(BB);
+
+      // Move all definitions in the predecessor to the successor...
+      BasicBlock::InstListType::iterator DI = Pred->getInstList().end();
+      assert(Pred->getTerminator() && 
+	     "Degenerate basic block encountered!");  // Empty bb???      
+      delete Pred->getInstList().remove(--DI); // Remove terminator
+      
+      while (Pred->getInstList().begin() != (DI = Pred->getInstList().end())) {
+        Instruction *Def = Pred->getInstList().remove(--DI); // Remove from end
+        BB->getInstList().push_front(Def);                   // Add to front...
+      }
+
+      // Remove basic block from the method...
+      BBs.remove(Pred);
+
+      // Always inherit predecessors name if it exists...
+      if (Pred->hasName()) BB->setName(Pred->getName());
+
+      // So long you waste of a basic block you...
+      delete Pred;
+    }
+  }
+
+  // Remove unused constants
+  Changed |= DoRemoveUnusedConstants(M);
+  return Changed;
+}
+
+
+// It is possible that we may require multiple passes over the code to fully
+// eliminate dead code.  Iterate until we are done.
+//
+bool DoDeadCodeElimination(Method *M) {
+  bool Changed = false;
+  while (DoDCEPass(M)) Changed = true;
+  return Changed;
+}
+
+bool DoDeadCodeElimination(Module *C) { 
+  bool Val = ApplyOptToAllMethods(C, DoDeadCodeElimination);
+  while (DoRemoveUnusedConstants(C)) Val = true;
+  return Val;
+}
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/SymbolStripping.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/SymbolStripping.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..af5f18f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/SymbolStripping.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+//===- SymbolStripping.cpp - Code to string symbols for methods and modules -=//
+//
+// This file implements stripping symbols out of symbol tables.
+//
+// Specifically, this allows you to strip all of the symbols out of:
+//   * A method
+//   * All methods in a module
+//   * All symbols in a module (all method symbols + all module scope symbols)
+//
+// Notice that:
+//   * This pass makes code much less readable, so it should only be used in
+//     situations where the 'strip' utility would be used (such as reducing 
+//     code size, and making it harder to reverse engineer code).
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#include "llvm/Module.h"
+#include "llvm/Method.h"
+#include "llvm/SymbolTable.h"
+#include "llvm/Opt/AllOpts.h"
+
+static bool StripSymbolTable(SymbolTable *SymTab) {
+  if (SymTab == 0) return false;    // No symbol table?  No problem.
+  bool RemovedSymbol = false;
+
+  for (SymbolTable::iterator I = SymTab->begin(); I != SymTab->end(); I++) {
+    map<const string, Value *> &Plane = I->second;
+    
+    map<const string, Value *>::iterator B;
+    while ((B = Plane.begin()) != Plane.end()) {   // Found nonempty type plane!
+      B->second->setName("");     // Set name to "", removing from symbol table!
+      RemovedSymbol = true;
+      assert(Plane.begin() != B);
+    }
+  }
+ 
+  return RemovedSymbol;
+}
+
+
+// DoSymbolStripping - Remove all symbolic information from a method
+//
+bool DoSymbolStripping(Method *M) {
+  return StripSymbolTable(M->getSymbolTable());
+}
+
+// DoFullSymbolStripping - Remove all symbolic information from all methods 
+// in a module, and all module level symbols. (method names, etc...)
+//
+bool DoFullSymbolStripping(Module *M) {
+  // Remove all symbols from methods in this module... and then strip all of the
+  // symbols in this module...
+  //  
+  return DoSymbolStripping(M) | StripSymbolTable(M->getSymbolTable());
+}