Avoid doing conservative phi checks in aliasSameBasePointerGEPs() if no phis have been visited yet.

Reviewers: Daniel Berlin

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34478

llvm-svn: 307581
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Analysis/BasicAliasAnalysis.cpp b/llvm/lib/Analysis/BasicAliasAnalysis.cpp
index b52a1d7..758a907 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Analysis/BasicAliasAnalysis.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Analysis/BasicAliasAnalysis.cpp
@@ -922,11 +922,11 @@
 
 /// Provide ad-hoc rules to disambiguate accesses through two GEP operators,
 /// both having the exact same pointer operand.
-static AliasResult aliasSameBasePointerGEPs(const GEPOperator *GEP1,
-                                            uint64_t V1Size,
-                                            const GEPOperator *GEP2,
-                                            uint64_t V2Size,
-                                            const DataLayout &DL) {
+AliasResult BasicAAResult::aliasSameBasePointerGEPs(const GEPOperator *GEP1,
+                                                    uint64_t V1Size,
+                                                    const GEPOperator *GEP2,
+                                                    uint64_t V2Size,
+                                                    const DataLayout &DL) {
 
   assert(GEP1->getPointerOperand()->stripPointerCastsAndBarriers() ==
              GEP2->getPointerOperand()->stripPointerCastsAndBarriers() &&
@@ -1006,7 +1006,7 @@
     // Because they cannot partially overlap and because fields in an array
     // cannot overlap, if we can prove the final indices are different between
     // GEP1 and GEP2, we can conclude GEP1 and GEP2 don't alias.
-    
+
     // If the last indices are constants, we've already checked they don't
     // equal each other so we can exit early.
     if (C1 && C2)
@@ -1014,11 +1014,15 @@
     {
       Value *GEP1LastIdx = GEP1->getOperand(GEP1->getNumOperands() - 1);
       Value *GEP2LastIdx = GEP2->getOperand(GEP2->getNumOperands() - 1);
-      if (isa<PHINode>(GEP1LastIdx) || isa<PHINode>(GEP2LastIdx)) {
+      if ((isa<PHINode>(GEP1LastIdx) || isa<PHINode>(GEP2LastIdx)) &&
+          !VisitedPhiBBs.empty()) {
         // If one of the indices is a PHI node, be safe and only use
         // computeKnownBits so we don't make any assumptions about the
         // relationships between the two indices. This is important if we're
         // asking about values from different loop iterations. See PR32314.
+        // But, with empty visitedPhiBBs we can guarantee that the values are
+        // from the same iteration. Therefore, we can avoid doing this
+        // conservative check.
         // TODO: We may be able to change the check so we only do this when
         // we definitely looked through a PHINode.
         if (GEP1LastIdx != GEP2LastIdx &&