| commit | 31cbe0f240f660f15602c96b787c58a26f17e179 | [log] [tgz] |
|---|---|---|
| author | Louis Dionne <ldionne@apple.com> | Mon Jun 01 10:38:23 2020 -0400 |
| committer | Louis Dionne <ldionne@apple.com> | Wed Jun 03 09:37:22 2020 -0400 |
| tree | 84d9049b130dedb1198b0a80621e9ac87cdbd0fd | |
| parent | 6163fa79268dcdcb7131d2b2f28d49a2c574f29a [diff] |
[libc++] Remove the c++98 Lit feature from the test suite C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned. As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do. This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926
diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/strings/basic.string.hash/char_type_hash.fail.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/strings/basic.string.hash/char_type_hash.fail.cpp index 9d90af9..94cd87b 100644 --- a/libcxx/test/std/strings/basic.string.hash/char_type_hash.fail.cpp +++ b/libcxx/test/std/strings/basic.string.hash/char_type_hash.fail.cpp
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ // GCC 5 does not evaluate static assertions dependent on a template parameter. // UNSUPPORTED: gcc-5 -// UNSUPPORTED: c++98, c++03 +// UNSUPPORTED: c++03 // <string>
diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/strings/basic.string.hash/enabled_hashes.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/strings/basic.string.hash/enabled_hashes.pass.cpp index 41a6f1e..0935b89 100644 --- a/libcxx/test/std/strings/basic.string.hash/enabled_hashes.pass.cpp +++ b/libcxx/test/std/strings/basic.string.hash/enabled_hashes.pass.cpp
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ // //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// -// UNSUPPORTED: c++98, c++03 +// UNSUPPORTED: c++03 // <string>