Fix up lldb after clang r360311.
Patch by Tyker!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60934
llvm-svn: 360312
diff --git a/lldb/source/Symbol/ClangASTContext.cpp b/lldb/source/Symbol/ClangASTContext.cpp
index 4a40c4d..4d25bf3 100644
--- a/lldb/source/Symbol/ClangASTContext.cpp
+++ b/lldb/source/Symbol/ClangASTContext.cpp
@@ -8173,6 +8173,10 @@
if (is_artificial)
return nullptr; // skip everything artificial
+ const clang::ExplicitSpecifier explicit_spec(
+ nullptr /*expr*/, is_explicit
+ ? clang::ExplicitSpecKind::ResolvedTrue
+ : clang::ExplicitSpecKind::ResolvedFalse);
if (name[0] == '~') {
cxx_dtor_decl = clang::CXXDestructorDecl::Create(
*getASTContext(), cxx_record_decl, clang::SourceLocation(),
@@ -8191,7 +8195,7 @@
clang::SourceLocation()),
method_qual_type,
nullptr, // TypeSourceInfo *
- is_explicit, is_inline, is_artificial, false /*is_constexpr*/);
+ explicit_spec, is_inline, is_artificial, false /*is_constexpr*/);
cxx_method_decl = cxx_ctor_decl;
} else {
clang::StorageClass SC = is_static ? clang::SC_Static : clang::SC_None;
@@ -8226,7 +8230,7 @@
clang::SourceLocation()),
method_qual_type,
nullptr, // TypeSourceInfo *
- is_inline, is_explicit, false /*is_constexpr*/,
+ is_inline, explicit_spec, false /*is_constexpr*/,
clang::SourceLocation());
}
}