PR15597: Fix a confusion between the implicit exception specification and the
uninstantiated exception specification when a special member within a class
template is both defaulted and given an exception specification on its first
declaration.
llvm-svn: 178103
diff --git a/clang/test/SemaCXX/cxx0x-defaulted-functions.cpp b/clang/test/SemaCXX/cxx0x-defaulted-functions.cpp
index 3ba03c4..bc03bcd 100644
--- a/clang/test/SemaCXX/cxx0x-defaulted-functions.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/SemaCXX/cxx0x-defaulted-functions.cpp
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 -fsyntax-only -verify -fcxx-exceptions %s
void fn() = default; // expected-error {{only special member}}
struct foo {
@@ -175,3 +175,16 @@
template<typename _Tp> // expected-error {{templates must have C++ linkage}}
void PR13573(const _Tp&) = delete; // expected-error {{only functions can have deleted definitions}}
}
+
+namespace PR15597 {
+ template<typename T> struct A {
+ A() noexcept(true) = default;
+ ~A() noexcept(true) = default;
+ };
+ template<typename T> struct B {
+ B() noexcept(false) = default; // expected-error {{does not match the calculated one}}
+ ~B() noexcept(false) = default; // expected-error {{does not match the calculated one}}
+ };
+ A<int> a;
+ B<int> b; // expected-note {{here}}
+}