Parsing and semantic analysis for template-ids that name overloaded
operators, e.g.,
operator+<int>
which now works in declarators, id-expressions, and member access
expressions. This commit only implements the non-dependent case, where
we can resolve the template-id to an actual declaration.
llvm-svn: 85966
diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp
index efaab20..2e1a89e 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp
@@ -98,29 +98,43 @@
}
TemplateNameKind Sema::isTemplateName(Scope *S,
- const IdentifierInfo &II,
- SourceLocation IdLoc,
- const CXXScopeSpec *SS,
+ const CXXScopeSpec &SS,
+ UnqualifiedId &Name,
TypeTy *ObjectTypePtr,
bool EnteringContext,
TemplateTy &TemplateResult) {
+ DeclarationName TName;
+
+ switch (Name.getKind()) {
+ case UnqualifiedId::IK_Identifier:
+ TName = DeclarationName(Name.Identifier);
+ break;
+
+ case UnqualifiedId::IK_OperatorFunctionId:
+ TName = Context.DeclarationNames.getCXXOperatorName(
+ Name.OperatorFunctionId.Operator);
+ break;
+
+ default:
+ return TNK_Non_template;
+ }
+
// Determine where to perform name lookup
DeclContext *LookupCtx = 0;
bool isDependent = false;
if (ObjectTypePtr) {
// This nested-name-specifier occurs in a member access expression, e.g.,
// x->B::f, and we are looking into the type of the object.
- assert((!SS || !SS->isSet()) &&
- "ObjectType and scope specifier cannot coexist");
+ assert(!SS.isSet() && "ObjectType and scope specifier cannot coexist");
QualType ObjectType = QualType::getFromOpaquePtr(ObjectTypePtr);
LookupCtx = computeDeclContext(ObjectType);
isDependent = ObjectType->isDependentType();
- } else if (SS && SS->isSet()) {
+ } else if (SS.isSet()) {
// This nested-name-specifier occurs after another nested-name-specifier,
// so long into the context associated with the prior nested-name-specifier.
- LookupCtx = computeDeclContext(*SS, EnteringContext);
- isDependent = isDependentScopeSpecifier(*SS);
+ LookupCtx = computeDeclContext(SS, EnteringContext);
+ isDependent = isDependentScopeSpecifier(SS);
}
LookupResult Found;
@@ -132,10 +146,10 @@
// nested-name-specifier.
// The declaration context must be complete.
- if (!LookupCtx->isDependentContext() && RequireCompleteDeclContext(*SS))
+ if (!LookupCtx->isDependentContext() && RequireCompleteDeclContext(SS))
return TNK_Non_template;
- LookupQualifiedName(Found, LookupCtx, &II, LookupOrdinaryName);
+ LookupQualifiedName(Found, LookupCtx, TName, LookupOrdinaryName);
if (ObjectTypePtr && Found.getKind() == LookupResult::NotFound) {
// C++ [basic.lookup.classref]p1:
@@ -150,7 +164,7 @@
//
// FIXME: When we're instantiating a template, do we actually have to
// look in the scope of the template? Seems fishy...
- LookupName(Found, S, &II, LookupOrdinaryName);
+ LookupName(Found, S, TName, LookupOrdinaryName);
ObjectTypeSearchedInScope = true;
}
} else if (isDependent) {
@@ -158,7 +172,7 @@
return TNK_Non_template;
} else {
// Perform unqualified name lookup in the current scope.
- LookupName(Found, S, &II, LookupOrdinaryName);
+ LookupName(Found, S, TName, LookupOrdinaryName);
}
// FIXME: Cope with ambiguous name-lookup results.
@@ -177,7 +191,7 @@
// postfix-expression and [...]
//
LookupResult FoundOuter;
- LookupName(FoundOuter, S, &II, LookupOrdinaryName);
+ LookupName(FoundOuter, S, TName, LookupOrdinaryName);
// FIXME: Handle ambiguities in this lookup better
NamedDecl *OuterTemplate
= isAcceptableTemplateName(Context, FoundOuter.getAsSingleDecl(Context));
@@ -194,8 +208,10 @@
// entity as the one found in the class of the object expression,
// otherwise the program is ill-formed.
if (OuterTemplate->getCanonicalDecl() != Template->getCanonicalDecl()) {
- Diag(IdLoc, diag::err_nested_name_member_ref_lookup_ambiguous)
- << &II;
+ Diag(Name.getSourceRange().getBegin(),
+ diag::err_nested_name_member_ref_lookup_ambiguous)
+ << TName
+ << Name.getSourceRange();
Diag(Template->getLocation(), diag::note_ambig_member_ref_object_type)
<< QualType::getFromOpaquePtr(ObjectTypePtr);
Diag(OuterTemplate->getLocation(), diag::note_ambig_member_ref_scope);
@@ -206,9 +222,9 @@
}
}
- if (SS && SS->isSet() && !SS->isInvalid()) {
+ if (SS.isSet() && !SS.isInvalid()) {
NestedNameSpecifier *Qualifier
- = static_cast<NestedNameSpecifier *>(SS->getScopeRep());
+ = static_cast<NestedNameSpecifier *>(SS.getScopeRep());
if (OverloadedFunctionDecl *Ovl
= dyn_cast<OverloadedFunctionDecl>(Template))
TemplateResult
@@ -1345,9 +1361,8 @@
/// of the "template" keyword, and "apply" is the \p Name.
Sema::TemplateTy
Sema::ActOnDependentTemplateName(SourceLocation TemplateKWLoc,
- const IdentifierInfo &Name,
- SourceLocation NameLoc,
const CXXScopeSpec &SS,
+ UnqualifiedId &Name,
TypeTy *ObjectType) {
if ((ObjectType &&
computeDeclContext(QualType::getFromOpaquePtr(ObjectType))) ||
@@ -1369,11 +1384,13 @@
// "template" keyword is now permitted). We follow the C++0x
// rules, even in C++03 mode, retroactively applying the DR.
TemplateTy Template;
- TemplateNameKind TNK = isTemplateName(0, Name, NameLoc, &SS, ObjectType,
+ TemplateNameKind TNK = isTemplateName(0, SS, Name, ObjectType,
false, Template);
if (TNK == TNK_Non_template) {
- Diag(NameLoc, diag::err_template_kw_refers_to_non_template)
- << &Name;
+ Diag(Name.getSourceRange().getBegin(),
+ diag::err_template_kw_refers_to_non_template)
+ << GetNameFromUnqualifiedId(Name)
+ << Name.getSourceRange();
return TemplateTy();
}
@@ -1382,7 +1399,21 @@
NestedNameSpecifier *Qualifier
= static_cast<NestedNameSpecifier *>(SS.getScopeRep());
- return TemplateTy::make(Context.getDependentTemplateName(Qualifier, &Name));
+
+ switch (Name.getKind()) {
+ case UnqualifiedId::IK_Identifier:
+ return TemplateTy::make(Context.getDependentTemplateName(Qualifier,
+ Name.Identifier));
+
+ default:
+ break;
+ }
+
+ Diag(Name.getSourceRange().getBegin(),
+ diag::err_template_kw_refers_to_non_template)
+ << GetNameFromUnqualifiedId(Name)
+ << Name.getSourceRange();
+ return TemplateTy();
}
bool Sema::CheckTemplateTypeArgument(TemplateTypeParmDecl *Param,