Comment parsing: don't treat typedef to a typedef to a function as a
'function-like' type that can be annotated with \param.
Thanks to Eli Friedman for noticing!
llvm-svn: 163985
diff --git a/clang/test/Sema/warn-documentation.cpp b/clang/test/Sema/warn-documentation.cpp
index 2c8207b..649f072 100644
--- a/clang/test/Sema/warn-documentation.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/Sema/warn-documentation.cpp
@@ -297,6 +297,12 @@
/// \returns aaa.
typedef int (C::*test_param26)(int aaa, int ccc);
+typedef int (*test_param27)(int aaa);
+
+// expected-warning@+1 {{'\param' command used in a comment that is not attached to a function declaration}}
+/// \param aaa Meow.
+typedef test_param27 test_param28;
+
// expected-warning@+1 {{'\tparam' command used in a comment that is not attached to a template declaration}}
/// \tparam T Aaa