[SimplifyCFG] put the optional assumption cache pointer in the options struct; NFCI

This is a follow-up to https://reviews.llvm.org/D38138. 

I fixed the capitalization of some functions because we're changing those
lines anyway and that helped verify that we weren't accidentally dropping 
any options by using default param values.

llvm-svn: 314930
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyCFG.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyCFG.cpp
index cb24bb3..09c9611 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyCFG.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyCFG.cpp
@@ -167,7 +167,6 @@
 class SimplifyCFGOpt {
   const TargetTransformInfo &TTI;
   const DataLayout &DL;
-  AssumptionCache *AC;
   SmallPtrSetImpl<BasicBlock *> *LoopHeaders;
   const SimplifyCFGOptions &Options;
 
@@ -193,10 +192,9 @@
 
 public:
   SimplifyCFGOpt(const TargetTransformInfo &TTI, const DataLayout &DL,
-                 AssumptionCache *AC,
                  SmallPtrSetImpl<BasicBlock *> *LoopHeaders,
                  const SimplifyCFGOptions &Opts)
-      : TTI(TTI), DL(DL), AC(AC), LoopHeaders(LoopHeaders), Options(Opts) {}
+      : TTI(TTI), DL(DL), LoopHeaders(LoopHeaders), Options(Opts) {}
 
   bool run(BasicBlock *BB);
 };
@@ -3484,10 +3482,9 @@
 ///
 /// We prefer to split the edge to 'end' so that there is a true/false entry to
 /// the PHI, merging the third icmp into the switch.
-static bool TryToSimplifyUncondBranchWithICmpInIt(
+static bool tryToSimplifyUncondBranchWithICmpInIt(
     ICmpInst *ICI, IRBuilder<> &Builder, const DataLayout &DL,
-    const TargetTransformInfo &TTI, AssumptionCache *AC,
-    const SimplifyCFGOptions &Options) {
+    const TargetTransformInfo &TTI, const SimplifyCFGOptions &Options) {
   BasicBlock *BB = ICI->getParent();
 
   // If the block has any PHIs in it or the icmp has multiple uses, it is too
@@ -3522,7 +3519,7 @@
       ICI->eraseFromParent();
     }
     // BB is now empty, so it is likely to simplify away.
-    return SimplifyCFG(BB, TTI, AC, Options) | true;
+    return simplifyCFG(BB, TTI, Options) | true;
   }
 
   // Ok, the block is reachable from the default dest.  If the constant we're
@@ -3538,7 +3535,7 @@
     ICI->replaceAllUsesWith(V);
     ICI->eraseFromParent();
     // BB is now empty, so it is likely to simplify away.
-    return SimplifyCFG(BB, TTI, AC, Options) | true;
+    return simplifyCFG(BB, TTI, Options) | true;
   }
 
   // The use of the icmp has to be in the 'end' block, by the only PHI node in
@@ -4336,7 +4333,7 @@
 
 /// Compute masked bits for the condition of a switch
 /// and use it to remove dead cases.
-static bool EliminateDeadSwitchCases(SwitchInst *SI, AssumptionCache *AC,
+static bool eliminateDeadSwitchCases(SwitchInst *SI, AssumptionCache *AC,
                                      const DataLayout &DL) {
   Value *Cond = SI->getCondition();
   unsigned Bits = Cond->getType()->getIntegerBitWidth();
@@ -4763,8 +4760,8 @@
 /// If the switch is only used to initialize one or more
 /// phi nodes in a common successor block with only two different
 /// constant values, replace the switch with select.
-static bool SwitchToSelect(SwitchInst *SI, IRBuilder<> &Builder,
-                           AssumptionCache *AC, const DataLayout &DL,
+static bool switchToSelect(SwitchInst *SI, IRBuilder<> &Builder,
+                           const DataLayout &DL,
                            const TargetTransformInfo &TTI) {
   Value *const Cond = SI->getCondition();
   PHINode *PHI = nullptr;
@@ -5517,12 +5514,12 @@
     // see if that predecessor totally determines the outcome of this switch.
     if (BasicBlock *OnlyPred = BB->getSinglePredecessor())
       if (SimplifyEqualityComparisonWithOnlyPredecessor(SI, OnlyPred, Builder))
-        return SimplifyCFG(BB, TTI, AC, Options) | true;
+        return simplifyCFG(BB, TTI, Options) | true;
 
     Value *Cond = SI->getCondition();
     if (SelectInst *Select = dyn_cast<SelectInst>(Cond))
       if (SimplifySwitchOnSelect(SI, Select))
-        return SimplifyCFG(BB, TTI, AC, Options) | true;
+        return simplifyCFG(BB, TTI, Options) | true;
 
     // If the block only contains the switch, see if we can fold the block
     // away into any preds.
@@ -5532,22 +5529,22 @@
       ++BBI;
     if (SI == &*BBI)
       if (FoldValueComparisonIntoPredecessors(SI, Builder))
-        return SimplifyCFG(BB, TTI, AC, Options) | true;
+        return simplifyCFG(BB, TTI, Options) | true;
   }
 
   // Try to transform the switch into an icmp and a branch.
   if (TurnSwitchRangeIntoICmp(SI, Builder))
-    return SimplifyCFG(BB, TTI, AC, Options) | true;
+    return simplifyCFG(BB, TTI, Options) | true;
 
   // Remove unreachable cases.
-  if (EliminateDeadSwitchCases(SI, AC, DL))
-    return SimplifyCFG(BB, TTI, AC, Options) | true;
+  if (eliminateDeadSwitchCases(SI, Options.AC, DL))
+    return simplifyCFG(BB, TTI, Options) | true;
 
-  if (SwitchToSelect(SI, Builder, AC, DL, TTI))
-    return SimplifyCFG(BB, TTI, AC, Options) | true;
+  if (switchToSelect(SI, Builder, DL, TTI))
+    return simplifyCFG(BB, TTI, Options) | true;
 
   if (ForwardSwitchConditionToPHI(SI))
-    return SimplifyCFG(BB, TTI, AC, Options) | true;
+    return simplifyCFG(BB, TTI, Options) | true;
 
   // The conversion from switch to lookup tables results in difficult-to-analyze
   // code and makes pruning branches much harder. This is a problem if the
@@ -5556,10 +5553,10 @@
   // optimisation pipeline.
   if (Options.ConvertSwitchToLookupTable &&
       SwitchToLookupTable(SI, Builder, DL, TTI))
-    return SimplifyCFG(BB, TTI, AC, Options) | true;
+    return simplifyCFG(BB, TTI, Options) | true;
 
   if (ReduceSwitchRange(SI, Builder, DL, TTI))
-    return SimplifyCFG(BB, TTI, AC, Options) | true;
+    return simplifyCFG(BB, TTI, Options) | true;
 
   return false;
 }
@@ -5597,7 +5594,7 @@
 
   if (SelectInst *SI = dyn_cast<SelectInst>(IBI->getAddress())) {
     if (SimplifyIndirectBrOnSelect(IBI, SI))
-      return SimplifyCFG(BB, TTI, AC, Options) | true;
+      return simplifyCFG(BB, TTI, Options) | true;
   }
   return Changed;
 }
@@ -5707,8 +5704,7 @@
       for (++I; isa<DbgInfoIntrinsic>(I); ++I)
         ;
       if (I->isTerminator() &&
-          TryToSimplifyUncondBranchWithICmpInIt(ICI, Builder, DL, TTI, AC,
-                                                Options))
+          tryToSimplifyUncondBranchWithICmpInIt(ICI, Builder, DL, TTI, Options))
         return true;
     }
 
@@ -5726,7 +5722,7 @@
   // predecessor and use logical operations to update the incoming value
   // for PHI nodes in common successor.
   if (FoldBranchToCommonDest(BI, Options.BonusInstThreshold))
-    return SimplifyCFG(BB, TTI, AC, Options) | true;
+    return simplifyCFG(BB, TTI, Options) | true;
   return false;
 }
 
@@ -5751,7 +5747,7 @@
     // switch.
     if (BasicBlock *OnlyPred = BB->getSinglePredecessor())
       if (SimplifyEqualityComparisonWithOnlyPredecessor(BI, OnlyPred, Builder))
-        return SimplifyCFG(BB, TTI, AC, Options) | true;
+        return simplifyCFG(BB, TTI, Options) | true;
 
     // This block must be empty, except for the setcond inst, if it exists.
     // Ignore dbg intrinsics.
@@ -5761,14 +5757,14 @@
       ++I;
     if (&*I == BI) {
       if (FoldValueComparisonIntoPredecessors(BI, Builder))
-        return SimplifyCFG(BB, TTI, AC, Options) | true;
+        return simplifyCFG(BB, TTI, Options) | true;
     } else if (&*I == cast<Instruction>(BI->getCondition())) {
       ++I;
       // Ignore dbg intrinsics.
       while (isa<DbgInfoIntrinsic>(I))
         ++I;
       if (&*I == BI && FoldValueComparisonIntoPredecessors(BI, Builder))
-        return SimplifyCFG(BB, TTI, AC, Options) | true;
+        return simplifyCFG(BB, TTI, Options) | true;
     }
   }
 
@@ -5795,7 +5791,7 @@
                               : ConstantInt::getFalse(BB->getContext());
         BI->setCondition(CI);
         RecursivelyDeleteTriviallyDeadInstructions(OldCond);
-        return SimplifyCFG(BB, TTI, AC, Options) | true;
+        return simplifyCFG(BB, TTI, Options) | true;
       }
     }
   }
@@ -5804,7 +5800,7 @@
   // branches to us and one of our successors, fold the comparison into the
   // predecessor and use logical operations to pick the right destination.
   if (FoldBranchToCommonDest(BI, Options.BonusInstThreshold))
-    return SimplifyCFG(BB, TTI, AC, Options) | true;
+    return simplifyCFG(BB, TTI, Options) | true;
 
   // We have a conditional branch to two blocks that are only reachable
   // from BI.  We know that the condbr dominates the two blocks, so see if
@@ -5813,7 +5809,7 @@
   if (BI->getSuccessor(0)->getSinglePredecessor()) {
     if (BI->getSuccessor(1)->getSinglePredecessor()) {
       if (HoistThenElseCodeToIf(BI, TTI))
-        return SimplifyCFG(BB, TTI, AC, Options) | true;
+        return simplifyCFG(BB, TTI, Options) | true;
     } else {
       // If Successor #1 has multiple preds, we may be able to conditionally
       // execute Successor #0 if it branches to Successor #1.
@@ -5821,7 +5817,7 @@
       if (Succ0TI->getNumSuccessors() == 1 &&
           Succ0TI->getSuccessor(0) == BI->getSuccessor(1))
         if (SpeculativelyExecuteBB(BI, BI->getSuccessor(0), TTI))
-          return SimplifyCFG(BB, TTI, AC, Options) | true;
+          return simplifyCFG(BB, TTI, Options) | true;
     }
   } else if (BI->getSuccessor(1)->getSinglePredecessor()) {
     // If Successor #0 has multiple preds, we may be able to conditionally
@@ -5830,22 +5826,22 @@
     if (Succ1TI->getNumSuccessors() == 1 &&
         Succ1TI->getSuccessor(0) == BI->getSuccessor(0))
       if (SpeculativelyExecuteBB(BI, BI->getSuccessor(1), TTI))
-        return SimplifyCFG(BB, TTI, AC, Options) | true;
+        return simplifyCFG(BB, TTI, Options) | true;
   }
 
   // If this is a branch on a phi node in the current block, thread control
   // through this block if any PHI node entries are constants.
   if (PHINode *PN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(BI->getCondition()))
     if (PN->getParent() == BI->getParent())
-      if (FoldCondBranchOnPHI(BI, DL, AC))
-        return SimplifyCFG(BB, TTI, AC, Options) | true;
+      if (FoldCondBranchOnPHI(BI, DL, Options.AC))
+        return simplifyCFG(BB, TTI, Options) | true;
 
   // Scan predecessor blocks for conditional branches.
   for (pred_iterator PI = pred_begin(BB), E = pred_end(BB); PI != E; ++PI)
     if (BranchInst *PBI = dyn_cast<BranchInst>((*PI)->getTerminator()))
       if (PBI != BI && PBI->isConditional())
         if (SimplifyCondBranchToCondBranch(PBI, BI, DL))
-          return SimplifyCFG(BB, TTI, AC, Options) | true;
+          return simplifyCFG(BB, TTI, Options) | true;
 
   // Look for diamond patterns.
   if (MergeCondStores)
@@ -5853,7 +5849,7 @@
       if (BranchInst *PBI = dyn_cast<BranchInst>(PrevBB->getTerminator()))
         if (PBI != BI && PBI->isConditional())
           if (mergeConditionalStores(PBI, BI, DL))
-            return SimplifyCFG(BB, TTI, AC, Options) | true;
+            return simplifyCFG(BB, TTI, Options) | true;
 
   return false;
 }
@@ -6009,10 +6005,10 @@
   return Changed;
 }
 
-bool llvm::SimplifyCFG(BasicBlock *BB, const TargetTransformInfo &TTI,
-                       AssumptionCache *AC, const SimplifyCFGOptions &Options,
+bool llvm::simplifyCFG(BasicBlock *BB, const TargetTransformInfo &TTI,
+                       const SimplifyCFGOptions &Options,
                        SmallPtrSetImpl<BasicBlock *> *LoopHeaders) {
-  return SimplifyCFGOpt(TTI, BB->getModule()->getDataLayout(), AC, LoopHeaders,
+  return SimplifyCFGOpt(TTI, BB->getModule()->getDataLayout(), LoopHeaders,
                         Options)
       .run(BB);
 }