Fix for two constant propagation problems in GVN with the assume intrinsic
instruction.

Patch by Yuanrui Zhang.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16100

llvm-svn: 258435
diff --git a/llvm/include/llvm/Transforms/Utils/Local.h b/llvm/include/llvm/Transforms/Utils/Local.h
index 3ae01657..6c217c9 100644
--- a/llvm/include/llvm/Transforms/Utils/Local.h
+++ b/llvm/include/llvm/Transforms/Utils/Local.h
@@ -316,7 +316,7 @@
 unsigned replaceDominatedUsesWith(Value *From, Value *To, DominatorTree &DT,
                                   const BasicBlockEdge &Edge);
 /// \brief Replace each use of 'From' with 'To' if that use is dominated by
-/// the given BasicBlock. Returns the number of replacements made.
+/// the end of the given BasicBlock. Returns the number of replacements made.
 unsigned replaceDominatedUsesWith(Value *From, Value *To, DominatorTree &DT,
                                   const BasicBlock *BB);
 
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/GVN.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/GVN.cpp
index a028b8c4..5f55db6 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/GVN.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/GVN.cpp
@@ -2133,7 +2133,8 @@
 /// The given values are known to be equal in every block
 /// dominated by 'Root'.  Exploit this, for example by replacing 'LHS' with
 /// 'RHS' everywhere in the scope.  Returns whether a change was made.
-/// If DominatesByEdge is false, then it means that it is dominated by Root.End.
+/// If DominatesByEdge is false, then it means that we will propagate the RHS
+/// value starting from the end of Root.Start.
 bool GVN::propagateEquality(Value *LHS, Value *RHS, const BasicBlockEdge &Root,
                             bool DominatesByEdge) {
   SmallVector<std::pair<Value*, Value*>, 4> Worklist;
@@ -2195,7 +2196,7 @@
       unsigned NumReplacements =
           DominatesByEdge
               ? replaceDominatedUsesWith(LHS, RHS, *DT, Root)
-              : replaceDominatedUsesWith(LHS, RHS, *DT, Root.getEnd());
+              : replaceDominatedUsesWith(LHS, RHS, *DT, Root.getStart());
 
       Changed |= NumReplacements > 0;
       NumGVNEqProp += NumReplacements;
@@ -2271,7 +2272,7 @@
               DominatesByEdge
                   ? replaceDominatedUsesWith(NotCmp, NotVal, *DT, Root)
                   : replaceDominatedUsesWith(NotCmp, NotVal, *DT,
-                                             Root.getEnd());
+                                             Root.getStart());
           Changed |= NumReplacements > 0;
           NumGVNEqProp += NumReplacements;
         }
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/Local.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/Local.cpp
index 3e69553..ed941a7 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/Local.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/Local.cpp
@@ -1569,7 +1569,7 @@
        UI != UE;) {
     Use &U = *UI++;
     auto *I = cast<Instruction>(U.getUser());
-    if (DT.dominates(BB, I->getParent())) {
+    if (DT.properlyDominates(BB, I->getParent())) {
       U.set(To);
       DEBUG(dbgs() << "Replace dominated use of '" << From->getName() << "' as "
                    << *To << " in " << *U << "\n");
diff --git a/llvm/test/Transforms/GVN/assume-equal.ll b/llvm/test/Transforms/GVN/assume-equal.ll
index f9304a8..d423c16 100644
--- a/llvm/test/Transforms/GVN/assume-equal.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/Transforms/GVN/assume-equal.ll
@@ -226,6 +226,46 @@
   ret i32 17
 }
 
+; This test checks if GVN can do the constant propagation correctly
+; when there are multiple uses of the same assume value in the 
+; basic block that has a loop back-edge pointing to itself.
+;
+; CHECK-LABEL: define i32 @_Z1il(i32 %val, i1 %k)
+define i32 @_Z1il(i32 %val, i1 %k) {
+  br label %next
+
+next:
+; CHECK: tail call void @llvm.assume(i1 %k)
+; CHECK-NEXT: %cmp = icmp eq i32 %val, 50
+  tail call void @llvm.assume(i1 %k)
+  tail call void @llvm.assume(i1 %k)
+  %cmp = icmp eq i32 %val, 50
+  br i1 %cmp, label %next, label %meh
+
+meh:
+  ret i32 0 
+}
+
+; This test checks if GVN can prevent the constant propagation correctly
+; in the successor blocks that are not dominated by the basic block
+; with the assume instruction.
+;
+; CHECK-LABEL: define i1 @_z1im(i32 %val, i1 %k, i1 %j)
+define i1 @_z1im(i32 %val, i1 %k, i1 %j) {
+  br i1 %j, label %next, label %meh
+
+next:
+; CHECK: tail call void @llvm.assume(i1 %k)
+; CHECK-NEXT: br label %meh
+  tail call void @llvm.assume(i1 %k)
+  tail call void @llvm.assume(i1 %k)
+  br label %meh
+
+meh:
+; CHECK: ret i1 %k
+  ret i1 %k
+}
+
 declare noalias i8* @_Znwm(i64)
 declare void @_ZN1AC1Ev(%struct.A*)
 declare void @llvm.assume(i1)