clang-format: [JS] exponentiation operator
Summary: While its precedence should be higher than multiplicative, LLVM does not have a level for that, so for the time being just treat it as multiplicative.
Reviewers: djasper
Subscribers: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32864
llvm-svn: 302156
diff --git a/clang/lib/Format/FormatTokenLexer.cpp b/clang/lib/Format/FormatTokenLexer.cpp
index 1acc0c3..45c3ae1 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Format/FormatTokenLexer.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Format/FormatTokenLexer.cpp
@@ -74,6 +74,10 @@
static const tok::TokenKind JSShiftEqual[] = {tok::greater, tok::greater,
tok::greaterequal};
static const tok::TokenKind JSRightArrow[] = {tok::equal, tok::greater};
+ static const tok::TokenKind JSExponentiation[] = {tok::star, tok::star};
+ static const tok::TokenKind JSExponentiationEqual[] = {tok::star,
+ tok::starequal};
+
// FIXME: Investigate what token type gives the correct operator priority.
if (tryMergeTokens(JSIdentity, TT_BinaryOperator))
return;
@@ -83,6 +87,12 @@
return;
if (tryMergeTokens(JSRightArrow, TT_JsFatArrow))
return;
+ if (tryMergeTokens(JSExponentiation, TT_JsExponentiation))
+ return;
+ if (tryMergeTokens(JSExponentiationEqual, TT_JsExponentiationEqual)) {
+ Tokens.back()->Tok.setKind(tok::starequal);
+ return;
+ }
}
if (Style.Language == FormatStyle::LK_Java) {