Be more strict when checking the -flto option value
Summary:
It seems -flto must be either "thin" or "full". I think the use of
containValue is just a typo.
Reviewers: ruiu, tejohnson
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34055
llvm-svn: 305392
diff --git a/clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInvocation.cpp b/clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInvocation.cpp
index bb635b7..1667af2 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInvocation.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInvocation.cpp
@@ -649,8 +649,14 @@
Opts.NoUseJumpTables = Args.hasArg(OPT_fno_jump_tables);
Opts.PrepareForLTO = Args.hasArg(OPT_flto, OPT_flto_EQ);
- const Arg *A = Args.getLastArg(OPT_flto, OPT_flto_EQ);
- Opts.EmitSummaryIndex = A && A->containsValue("thin");
+ Opts.EmitSummaryIndex = false;
+ if (Arg *A = Args.getLastArg(OPT_flto_EQ)) {
+ StringRef S = A->getValue();
+ if (S == "thin")
+ Opts.EmitSummaryIndex = true;
+ else if (S != "full")
+ Diags.Report(diag::err_drv_invalid_value) << A->getAsString(Args) << S;
+ }
Opts.LTOUnit = Args.hasFlag(OPT_flto_unit, OPT_fno_lto_unit, false);
if (Arg *A = Args.getLastArg(OPT_fthinlto_index_EQ)) {
if (IK.getLanguage() != InputKind::LLVM_IR)