Be more strict when checking the -flto option value
Summary:
It seems -flto must be either "thin" or "full". I think the use of
containValue is just a typo.
Reviewers: ruiu, tejohnson
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34055
llvm-svn: 305392
diff --git a/clang/test/CodeGen/thinlto-backend-option.ll b/clang/test/CodeGen/thinlto-backend-option.ll
index 4c7c0ea..4fcdd07 100644
--- a/clang/test/CodeGen/thinlto-backend-option.ll
+++ b/clang/test/CodeGen/thinlto-backend-option.ll
@@ -8,6 +8,8 @@
; RUN: %clang -flto=thin -c -o %t.o %s
; RUN: llvm-lto -thinlto -o %t %t.o
-; RUN: not %clang_cc1 -x ir %t.o -fthinlto-index=%t.thinlto.bc -backend-option -nonexistent -emit-obj -o /dev/null 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: not %clang_cc1 -x ir %t.o -fthinlto-index=%t.thinlto.bc -backend-option -nonexistent -emit-obj -o /dev/null 2>&1 | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=UNKNOWN
+; UNKNOWN: clang: Unknown command line argument '-nonexistent'
-; CHECK: clang: Unknown command line argument '-nonexistent'
+; RUN: not %clang_cc1 -flto=thinfoo 2>&1 | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=INVALID
+; INVALID: error: invalid value 'thinfoo' in '-flto=thinfoo'