In mergeVisibility, if we already have an explicit visibility, keep it.
This fixes the included testcase and lets us simplify the code a bit. It
does require using mergeWithMin when merging class information to its
members. Expand the comments to explain why that works.
llvm-svn: 155103
diff --git a/clang/lib/AST/Decl.cpp b/clang/lib/AST/Decl.cpp
index f4c0aa3..8649ba2 100644
--- a/clang/lib/AST/Decl.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/AST/Decl.cpp
@@ -490,8 +490,10 @@
if (llvm::Optional<Visibility> Vis = D->getExplicitVisibility())
LV.mergeVisibility(*Vis, true);
}
- // Ignore both global visibility and attributes when computing our
- // parent's visibility if we already have an explicit one.
+
+ // If this class member has an explicit visibility attribute, the only
+ // thing that can change its visibility is the template arguments, so
+ // only look for them when processing the the class.
LVFlags ClassF = LV.visibilityExplicit() ?
LVFlags::CreateOnlyDeclLinkage() : F;
@@ -523,9 +525,12 @@
LV.mergeVisibility(HiddenVisibility, true);
}
- // Class members only have linkage if their class has external
- // linkage.
- LV.merge(getLVForDecl(cast<RecordDecl>(D->getDeclContext()), ClassF));
+ // If this member has an visibility attribute, ClassF will exclude
+ // attributes on the class or command line options, keeping only information
+ // about the template instantiation. If the member has no visibility
+ // attributes, mergeWithMin behaves like merge, so in both cases mergeWithMin
+ // produces the desired result.
+ LV.mergeWithMin(getLVForDecl(cast<RecordDecl>(D->getDeclContext()), ClassF));
if (!isExternalLinkage(LV.linkage()))
return LinkageInfo::none();
@@ -579,8 +584,7 @@
LinkageInfo TypeLV = getLVForType(VD->getType());
if (TypeLV.linkage() != ExternalLinkage)
LV.mergeLinkage(UniqueExternalLinkage);
- if (!LV.visibilityExplicit())
- LV.mergeVisibility(TypeLV);
+ LV.mergeVisibility(TypeLV);
}
return LV;