[clang-format] tweaked another case of lambda formatting

Summary:
This is done in order to improve cases where the lambda's body is moved too far to the right. Consider the following snippet with column limit set to 79:

```
void f() {
  leader::MakeThisCallHere(&leader_service_,
                           cq_.get(),
                           [this, liveness](const leader::ReadRecordReq& req,
                                            std::function<void()> done) {
                             logger_->HandleReadRecord(
                                 req, resp, std::move(done));
                           });

  leader::MakeAnother(&leader_service_,
                      cq_.get(),
                      [this, liveness](const leader::ReadRecordReq& req,
                                       std::function<void()> done) {
                        logger_->HandleReadRecord(
                            req, resp, std::move(done), a);
                      });
}
```

The tool favors extra indentation for the lambda body and so the code incurs extra wrapping and adjacent calls are indented to a different level. I find this behavior annoying and I'd like the tool to favor new lines and, thus, use the extra width.

The fix, reduced, brings the following formatting.

Before:

    function(1,
             [] {
               DoStuff();
               //
             },
             1);

After:

    function(
        1,
        [] {
          DoStuff();
          //
        },
        1);

Refer to the new tests in FormatTest.cpp

Contributed by oleg.smolsky!

Reviewers: djasper, klimek, krasimir

Subscribers: cfe-commits, owenpan

Tags: #clang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52676

llvm-svn: 345753
diff --git a/clang/lib/Format/ContinuationIndenter.cpp b/clang/lib/Format/ContinuationIndenter.cpp
index 89d346d..c369b94 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Format/ContinuationIndenter.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Format/ContinuationIndenter.cpp
@@ -1135,7 +1135,8 @@
   //   }, a, b, c);
   if (Current.isNot(tok::comment) && Previous &&
       Previous->isOneOf(tok::l_brace, TT_ArrayInitializerLSquare) &&
-      !Previous->is(TT_DictLiteral) && State.Stack.size() > 1) {
+      !Previous->is(TT_DictLiteral) && State.Stack.size() > 1 &&
+      !State.Stack.back().HasMultipleNestedBlocks) {
     if (State.Stack[State.Stack.size() - 2].NestedBlockInlined && Newline)
       for (unsigned i = 0, e = State.Stack.size() - 1; i != e; ++i)
         State.Stack[i].NoLineBreak = true;