commit 593e766fb5d5f477ab5ca14d8893b89a449863d5
author Devang Patel <dpatel@apple.com> Thu Jun 07 18:40:55 2007 +0000
committer Devang Patel <dpatel@apple.com> Thu Jun 07 18:40:55 2007 +0000
tree de80684edb2548c3eedaa55250a6c6bfa8d1c90f
parent 171bbf61edd74215aad6d7a3598f6089dbc15f16

Use DominatorTree instead of ETForest.

llvm-svn: 37494

llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/GCSE.cpp

diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/GCSE.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/GCSE.cpp
index d9f57c4..d7194bb 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/GCSE.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/GCSE.cpp
@@ -68,9 +68,9 @@
   bool Changed = false;
 
   // Get pointers to the analysis results that we will be using...
-  ETForest &EF = getAnalysis<ETForest>();
-  ValueNumbering &VN = getAnalysis<ValueNumbering>();
   DominatorTree &DT = getAnalysis<DominatorTree>();
+  ETForest &ET = getAnalysis<ETForest>();
+  ValueNumbering &VN = getAnalysis<ValueNumbering>();
 
   std::vector<Value*> EqualValues;
 
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@
             if (OtherI->getParent() == BB)
               Dominates = BlockInsts.count(OtherI);
             else
-              Dominates = EF.dominates(OtherI->getParent(), BB);
+              Dominates = ET.dominates(OtherI->getParent(), BB);
 
             if (Dominates) {
               // Okay, we found an instruction with the same value as this one