[RISCV] Define __riscv_cmodel_medlow and __riscv_cmodel_medany correctly
RISC-V LLVM was only implement small/medlow code model, so it defined
__riscv_cmodel_medlow directly without check.
Now, we have medium/medany code model in RISC-V back-end, it should
define according the actually code model.
Reviewed By: lewis-revill
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67065
llvm-svn: 372078
diff --git a/clang/lib/Basic/Targets/RISCV.cpp b/clang/lib/Basic/Targets/RISCV.cpp
index 0a8df86..ab8272c 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Basic/Targets/RISCV.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Basic/Targets/RISCV.cpp
@@ -88,8 +88,14 @@
Builder.defineMacro("__riscv");
bool Is64Bit = getTriple().getArch() == llvm::Triple::riscv64;
Builder.defineMacro("__riscv_xlen", Is64Bit ? "64" : "32");
- // TODO: modify when more code models are supported.
- Builder.defineMacro("__riscv_cmodel_medlow");
+ StringRef CodeModel = getTargetOpts().CodeModel;
+ if (CodeModel == "default")
+ CodeModel = "small";
+
+ if (CodeModel == "small")
+ Builder.defineMacro("__riscv_cmodel_medlow");
+ else if (CodeModel == "medium")
+ Builder.defineMacro("__riscv_cmodel_medany");
StringRef ABIName = getABI();
if (ABIName == "ilp32f" || ABIName == "lp64f")