[Driver] Fix driver support for color diagnostics
Diagnostics that happen during driver time do not have color output support
unless -fcolor-diagonostic is explicitly passed into the driver. This is not a
problem for cc1 since dianostic arguments are properly handled and color is
enabled by default if the terminal supports it.
Make the driver behave like CC1. There are tests that already check for these
flags, but for the color itself there's no sensible way to test it.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20404
rdar://problem/26290980
llvm-svn: 271042
diff --git a/clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInvocation.cpp b/clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInvocation.cpp
index a37e1ce..3b4c50b 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInvocation.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInvocation.cpp
@@ -860,8 +860,51 @@
ModuleFiles.end());
}
+static bool parseShowColorsArgs(const ArgList &Args, bool DefaultColor) {
+ // Color diagnostics default to auto ("on" if terminal supports) in the driver
+ // but default to off in cc1, needing an explicit OPT_fdiagnostics_color.
+ // Support both clang's -f[no-]color-diagnostics and gcc's
+ // -f[no-]diagnostics-colors[=never|always|auto].
+ enum {
+ Colors_On,
+ Colors_Off,
+ Colors_Auto
+ } ShowColors = DefaultColor ? Colors_Auto : Colors_Off;
+ for (Arg *A : Args) {
+ const Option &O = A->getOption();
+ if (!O.matches(options::OPT_fcolor_diagnostics) &&
+ !O.matches(options::OPT_fdiagnostics_color) &&
+ !O.matches(options::OPT_fno_color_diagnostics) &&
+ !O.matches(options::OPT_fno_diagnostics_color) &&
+ !O.matches(options::OPT_fdiagnostics_color_EQ))
+ continue;
+
+ if (O.matches(options::OPT_fcolor_diagnostics) ||
+ O.matches(options::OPT_fdiagnostics_color)) {
+ ShowColors = Colors_On;
+ } else if (O.matches(options::OPT_fno_color_diagnostics) ||
+ O.matches(options::OPT_fno_diagnostics_color)) {
+ ShowColors = Colors_Off;
+ } else {
+ assert(O.matches(options::OPT_fdiagnostics_color_EQ));
+ StringRef Value(A->getValue());
+ if (Value == "always")
+ ShowColors = Colors_On;
+ else if (Value == "never")
+ ShowColors = Colors_Off;
+ else if (Value == "auto")
+ ShowColors = Colors_Auto;
+ }
+ }
+ if (ShowColors == Colors_On ||
+ (ShowColors == Colors_Auto && llvm::sys::Process::StandardErrHasColors()))
+ return true;
+ return false;
+}
+
bool clang::ParseDiagnosticArgs(DiagnosticOptions &Opts, ArgList &Args,
- DiagnosticsEngine *Diags) {
+ DiagnosticsEngine *Diags,
+ bool DefaultDiagColor) {
using namespace options;
bool Success = true;
@@ -874,7 +917,7 @@
Opts.Pedantic = Args.hasArg(OPT_pedantic);
Opts.PedanticErrors = Args.hasArg(OPT_pedantic_errors);
Opts.ShowCarets = !Args.hasArg(OPT_fno_caret_diagnostics);
- Opts.ShowColors = Args.hasArg(OPT_fcolor_diagnostics);
+ Opts.ShowColors = parseShowColorsArgs(Args, DefaultDiagColor);
Opts.ShowColumn = Args.hasFlag(OPT_fshow_column,
OPT_fno_show_column,
/*Default=*/true);
@@ -2240,7 +2283,8 @@
Success &= ParseAnalyzerArgs(*Res.getAnalyzerOpts(), Args, Diags);
Success &= ParseMigratorArgs(Res.getMigratorOpts(), Args);
ParseDependencyOutputArgs(Res.getDependencyOutputOpts(), Args);
- Success &= ParseDiagnosticArgs(Res.getDiagnosticOpts(), Args, &Diags);
+ Success &= ParseDiagnosticArgs(Res.getDiagnosticOpts(), Args, &Diags,
+ false /*DefaultDiagColor*/);
ParseCommentArgs(LangOpts.CommentOpts, Args);
ParseFileSystemArgs(Res.getFileSystemOpts(), Args);
// FIXME: We shouldn't have to pass the DashX option around here