Improve handling of base initializers. We now parse initializers in out of line decls, such as:
class C {
C() { }
int a;
};
C::C() : a(10) { }
We also diagnose when initializers are used on declarations that aren't constructors:
t.cpp:1:10: error: only constructors take base initializers
void f() : a(10) { }
^
Doug and/or Sebastian: I'd appreciate a review, especially the nested-name-spec test results (from the looks of it we now match gcc in that test.)
llvm-svn: 67672
diff --git a/clang/test/SemaCXX/nested-name-spec.cpp b/clang/test/SemaCXX/nested-name-spec.cpp
index 7aaa991..f575fb8 100644
--- a/clang/test/SemaCXX/nested-name-spec.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/SemaCXX/nested-name-spec.cpp
@@ -168,5 +168,6 @@
// FIXME: ugly: expected-error{{invalid token after top level declarator}}
X::X() : a(5) { } // expected-error{{use of undeclared identifier 'X'}} \
- // expected-error{{expected function body after function declarator}}
+ // expected-error{{C++ requires a type specifier for all declarations}} \
+ // expected-error{{only constructors take base initializers}}