[XRay] Improve test matching granularity (NFC)
Simplify matchers for unittest to better isolate which differences there
are that we're finding in failures.
llvm-svn: 341237
diff --git a/llvm/unittests/XRay/FDRTraceWriterTest.cpp b/llvm/unittests/XRay/FDRTraceWriterTest.cpp
index cbe6346..215a2d2 100644
--- a/llvm/unittests/XRay/FDRTraceWriterTest.cpp
+++ b/llvm/unittests/XRay/FDRTraceWriterTest.cpp
@@ -63,16 +63,17 @@
auto &Trace = TraceOrErr.get();
ASSERT_THAT(Trace, Not(IsEmpty()));
- ASSERT_THAT(
- Trace,
- ElementsAre(AllOf(Field(&XRayRecord::FuncId, Eq(1)),
- Field(&XRayRecord::TId, Eq(1u)),
- Field(&XRayRecord::CPU, Eq(1u)),
- Field(&XRayRecord::Type, Eq(RecordTypes::ENTER))),
- AllOf(Field(&XRayRecord::FuncId, Eq(1)),
- Field(&XRayRecord::TId, Eq(1u)),
- Field(&XRayRecord::CPU, Eq(1u)),
- Field(&XRayRecord::Type, Eq(RecordTypes::EXIT)))));
+ ASSERT_THAT(Trace, ElementsAre(Field(&XRayRecord::FuncId, Eq(1)),
+ Field(&XRayRecord::FuncId, Eq(1))));
+ ASSERT_THAT(Trace, ElementsAre(Field(&XRayRecord::TId, Eq(1u)),
+ Field(&XRayRecord::TId, Eq(1u))));
+ ASSERT_THAT(Trace, ElementsAre(Field(&XRayRecord::PId, Eq(1u)),
+ Field(&XRayRecord::PId, Eq(1u))));
+ ASSERT_THAT(Trace, ElementsAre(Field(&XRayRecord::CPU, Eq(1u)),
+ Field(&XRayRecord::CPU, Eq(1u))));
+ ASSERT_THAT(Trace,
+ ElementsAre(Field(&XRayRecord::Type, Eq(RecordTypes::ENTER)),
+ Field(&XRayRecord::Type, Eq(RecordTypes::EXIT))));
}
// This version is almost exactly the same as above, except writing version 2
@@ -107,16 +108,15 @@
auto &Trace = TraceOrErr.get();
ASSERT_THAT(Trace, Not(IsEmpty()));
- ASSERT_THAT(
- Trace,
- ElementsAre(AllOf(Field(&XRayRecord::FuncId, Eq(1)),
- Field(&XRayRecord::TId, Eq(1u)),
- Field(&XRayRecord::CPU, Eq(1u)),
- Field(&XRayRecord::Type, Eq(RecordTypes::ENTER))),
- AllOf(Field(&XRayRecord::FuncId, Eq(1)),
- Field(&XRayRecord::TId, Eq(1u)),
- Field(&XRayRecord::CPU, Eq(1u)),
- Field(&XRayRecord::Type, Eq(RecordTypes::EXIT)))));
+ ASSERT_THAT(Trace, ElementsAre(Field(&XRayRecord::FuncId, Eq(1)),
+ Field(&XRayRecord::FuncId, Eq(1))));
+ ASSERT_THAT(Trace, ElementsAre(Field(&XRayRecord::TId, Eq(1u)),
+ Field(&XRayRecord::TId, Eq(1u))));
+ ASSERT_THAT(Trace, ElementsAre(Field(&XRayRecord::CPU, Eq(1u)),
+ Field(&XRayRecord::CPU, Eq(1u))));
+ ASSERT_THAT(Trace,
+ ElementsAre(Field(&XRayRecord::Type, Eq(RecordTypes::ENTER)),
+ Field(&XRayRecord::Type, Eq(RecordTypes::EXIT))));
}
// This covers version 1 of the log, without a BufferExtents record but has an
@@ -167,16 +167,16 @@
auto &Trace = TraceOrErr.get();
ASSERT_THAT(Trace, Not(IsEmpty()));
- ASSERT_THAT(
- Trace,
- ElementsAre(AllOf(Field(&XRayRecord::FuncId, Eq(1)),
- Field(&XRayRecord::TId, Eq(1u)),
- Field(&XRayRecord::CPU, Eq(1u)),
- Field(&XRayRecord::Type, Eq(RecordTypes::ENTER))),
- AllOf(Field(&XRayRecord::FuncId, Eq(1)),
- Field(&XRayRecord::TId, Eq(1u)),
- Field(&XRayRecord::CPU, Eq(1u)),
- Field(&XRayRecord::Type, Eq(RecordTypes::EXIT)))));
+ ASSERT_THAT(Trace, Not(IsEmpty()));
+ ASSERT_THAT(Trace, ElementsAre(Field(&XRayRecord::FuncId, Eq(1)),
+ Field(&XRayRecord::FuncId, Eq(1))));
+ ASSERT_THAT(Trace, ElementsAre(Field(&XRayRecord::TId, Eq(1u)),
+ Field(&XRayRecord::TId, Eq(1u))));
+ ASSERT_THAT(Trace, ElementsAre(Field(&XRayRecord::CPU, Eq(1u)),
+ Field(&XRayRecord::CPU, Eq(1u))));
+ ASSERT_THAT(Trace,
+ ElementsAre(Field(&XRayRecord::Type, Eq(RecordTypes::ENTER)),
+ Field(&XRayRecord::Type, Eq(RecordTypes::EXIT))));
}
} // namespace