Allow non-defining declarations of class template partial specializations to
have a nested name specifier. Strictly speaking, forward declarations of class
template partial specializations are not permitted at all, but that seems like
an obvious wording defect, and if we allow them without a nested name specifier
we should also allow them with a nested name specifier.
llvm-svn: 255383
diff --git a/clang/test/Modules/Inputs/submodules-merge-defs/defs.h b/clang/test/Modules/Inputs/submodules-merge-defs/defs.h
index e9d7284..f6004f0 100644
--- a/clang/test/Modules/Inputs/submodules-merge-defs/defs.h
+++ b/clang/test/Modules/Inputs/submodules-merge-defs/defs.h
@@ -131,3 +131,10 @@
};
template<typename A, int B> template<typename C> F<A[B]>::F() {}
}
+
+struct MemberClassTemplate {
+ template<typename T> struct A;
+};
+template<typename T> struct MemberClassTemplate::A {};
+template<typename T> struct MemberClassTemplate::A<T*> {};
+template<> struct MemberClassTemplate::A<int> {};