[IR] Reformulate LLVM's EH funclet IR

While we have successfully implemented a funclet-oriented EH scheme on
top of LLVM IR, our scheme has some notable deficiencies:
- catchendpad and cleanupendpad are necessary in the current design
  but they are difficult to explain to others, even to seasoned LLVM
  experts.
- catchendpad and cleanupendpad are optimization barriers.  They cannot
  be split and force all potentially throwing call-sites to be invokes.
  This has a noticable effect on the quality of our code generation.
- catchpad, while similar in some aspects to invoke, is fairly awkward.
  It is unsplittable, starts a funclet, and has control flow to other
  funclets.
- The nesting relationship between funclets is currently a property of
  control flow edges.  Because of this, we are forced to carefully
  analyze the flow graph to see if there might potentially exist illegal
  nesting among funclets.  While we have logic to clone funclets when
  they are illegally nested, it would be nicer if we had a
  representation which forbade them upfront.

Let's clean this up a bit by doing the following:
- Instead, make catchpad more like cleanuppad and landingpad: no control
  flow, just a bunch of simple operands;  catchpad would be splittable.
- Introduce catchswitch, a control flow instruction designed to model
  the constraints of funclet oriented EH.
- Make funclet scoping explicit by having funclet instructions consume
  the token produced by the funclet which contains them.
- Remove catchendpad and cleanupendpad.  Their presence can be inferred
  implicitly using coloring information.

N.B.  The state numbering code for the CLR has been updated but the
veracity of it's output cannot be spoken for.  An expert should take a
look to make sure the results are reasonable.

Reviewers: rnk, JosephTremoulet, andrew.w.kaylor

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15139

llvm-svn: 255422
diff --git a/llvm/test/Transforms/SimplifyCFG/wineh-unreachable.ll b/llvm/test/Transforms/SimplifyCFG/wineh-unreachable.ll
index 31d567f..aa1feb7 100644
--- a/llvm/test/Transforms/SimplifyCFG/wineh-unreachable.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/Transforms/SimplifyCFG/wineh-unreachable.ll
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
 exit:
   ret void
 unreachable.unwind:
-  cleanuppad []
+  cleanuppad within none []
   unreachable  
 }
 
@@ -22,24 +22,21 @@
   invoke void @f()
     to label %exit unwind label %catch.pad
 catch.pad:
-  ; CHECK: catchpad []
-  ; CHECK-NEXT: to label %catch.body unwind label %catch.end
-  %catch = catchpad []
-    to label %catch.body unwind label %catch.end
+  %cs1 = catchswitch within none [label %catch.body] unwind label %unreachable.unwind
+  ; CHECK: catch.pad:
+  ; CHECK-NEXT: catchswitch within none [label %catch.body] unwind to caller
 catch.body:
   ; CHECK:      catch.body:
+  ; CHECK-NEXT:   catchpad within %cs1
   ; CHECK-NEXT:   call void @f()
   ; CHECK-NEXT:   unreachable
+  %catch = catchpad within %cs1 []
   call void @f()
-  catchret %catch to label %unreachable
-catch.end:
-  ; CHECK: catch.end:
-  ; CHECK-NEXT: catchendpad unwind to caller
-  catchendpad unwind label %unreachable.unwind
+  catchret from %catch to label %unreachable
 exit:
   ret void
 unreachable.unwind:
-  cleanuppad []
+  cleanuppad within none []
   unreachable
 unreachable:
   unreachable
@@ -51,24 +48,20 @@
   invoke void @f()
     to label %exit unwind label %cleanup.pad
 cleanup.pad:
-  ; CHECK: %cleanup = cleanuppad []
+  ; CHECK: %cleanup = cleanuppad within none []
   ; CHECK-NEXT: call void @f()
   ; CHECK-NEXT: unreachable
-  %cleanup = cleanuppad []
+  %cleanup = cleanuppad within none []
   invoke void @f()
-    to label %cleanup.ret unwind label %cleanup.end
+    to label %cleanup.ret unwind label %unreachable.unwind
 cleanup.ret:
   ; This cleanupret should be rewritten to unreachable,
   ; and merged into the pred block.
-  cleanupret %cleanup unwind label %unreachable.unwind
-cleanup.end:
-  ; This cleanupendpad should be rewritten to unreachable,
-  ; causing the invoke to be rewritten to a call.
-  cleanupendpad %cleanup unwind label %unreachable.unwind
+  cleanupret from %cleanup unwind label %unreachable.unwind
 exit:
   ret void
 unreachable.unwind:
-  cleanuppad []
+  cleanuppad within none []
   unreachable
 }
 
@@ -78,12 +71,12 @@
   invoke void @f()
     to label %exit unwind label %terminate.pad
 terminate.pad:
-  ; CHECK: terminatepad [] unwind to caller
-  terminatepad [] unwind label %unreachable.unwind
+  ; CHECK: terminatepad within none [] unwind to caller
+  terminatepad within none [] unwind label %unreachable.unwind
 exit:
   ret void
 unreachable.unwind:
-  cleanuppad []
+  cleanuppad within none []
   unreachable
 }
 
@@ -94,14 +87,11 @@
           to label %exit unwind label %catch.pad
 
 catch.pad:
-  %catch = catchpad []
-          to label %catch.body unwind label %catch.end
+  %cs1 = catchswitch within none [label %catch.body] unwind to caller
 
 catch.body:
-  catchret %catch to label %exit
-
-catch.end:
-  catchendpad unwind to caller
+  %catch = catchpad within %cs1 []
+  catchret from %catch to label %exit
 
 exit:
   unreachable