Diagnose when omitting braces in direct list-initialization in C++0x.
This also applies to C99-style aggregate literals, should they be used in C++11, since they are effectively identical to constructor call list-initialization syntax.
llvm-svn: 142147
diff --git a/clang/test/SemaCXX/cxx0x-initializer-aggregates.cpp b/clang/test/SemaCXX/cxx0x-initializer-aggregates.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..687d272
--- /dev/null
+++ b/clang/test/SemaCXX/cxx0x-initializer-aggregates.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++0x -fsyntax-only -verify %s
+
+namespace aggregate {
+ // Direct list initialization does NOT allow braces to be elided!
+ struct S {
+ int ar[2];
+ struct T {
+ int i1;
+ int i2;
+ } t;
+ struct U {
+ int i1;
+ } u[2];
+ struct V {
+ int var[2];
+ } v;
+ };
+
+ void test() {
+ S s1 = { 1, 2, 3 ,4, 5, 6, 7, 8 }; // no-error
+ S s2{ {1, 2}, {3, 4}, { {5}, {6} }, { {7, 8} } }; // completely braced
+ S s3{ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 }; // expected-error 5 {{cannot omit braces}}
+ S s4{ {1, 2}, {3, 4}, {5, 6}, { {7, 8} } }; // expected-error 2 {{cannot omit braces}}
+ S s5{ {1, 2}, {3, 4}, { {5}, {6} }, {7, 8} }; // expected-error {{cannot omit braces}}
+ }
+}