Add a wrapper around copy_if in STLExtras; NFC
I will add one more use for this in a later change.
llvm-svn: 295685
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopDistribute.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopDistribute.cpp
index 19716b2..3624bba 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopDistribute.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopDistribute.cpp
@@ -812,29 +812,29 @@
const RuntimePointerChecking *RtPtrChecking) {
SmallVector<RuntimePointerChecking::PointerCheck, 4> Checks;
- std::copy_if(AllChecks.begin(), AllChecks.end(), std::back_inserter(Checks),
- [&](const RuntimePointerChecking::PointerCheck &Check) {
- for (unsigned PtrIdx1 : Check.first->Members)
- for (unsigned PtrIdx2 : Check.second->Members)
- // Only include this check if there is a pair of pointers
- // that require checking and the pointers fall into
- // separate partitions.
- //
- // (Note that we already know at this point that the two
- // pointer groups need checking but it doesn't follow
- // that each pair of pointers within the two groups need
- // checking as well.
- //
- // In other words we don't want to include a check just
- // because there is a pair of pointers between the two
- // pointer groups that require checks and a different
- // pair whose pointers fall into different partitions.)
- if (RtPtrChecking->needsChecking(PtrIdx1, PtrIdx2) &&
- !RuntimePointerChecking::arePointersInSamePartition(
- PtrToPartition, PtrIdx1, PtrIdx2))
- return true;
- return false;
- });
+ copy_if(AllChecks, std::back_inserter(Checks),
+ [&](const RuntimePointerChecking::PointerCheck &Check) {
+ for (unsigned PtrIdx1 : Check.first->Members)
+ for (unsigned PtrIdx2 : Check.second->Members)
+ // Only include this check if there is a pair of pointers
+ // that require checking and the pointers fall into
+ // separate partitions.
+ //
+ // (Note that we already know at this point that the two
+ // pointer groups need checking but it doesn't follow
+ // that each pair of pointers within the two groups need
+ // checking as well.
+ //
+ // In other words we don't want to include a check just
+ // because there is a pair of pointers between the two
+ // pointer groups that require checks and a different
+ // pair whose pointers fall into different partitions.)
+ if (RtPtrChecking->needsChecking(PtrIdx1, PtrIdx2) &&
+ !RuntimePointerChecking::arePointersInSamePartition(
+ PtrToPartition, PtrIdx1, PtrIdx2))
+ return true;
+ return false;
+ });
return Checks;
}