Rename Error -> Status.
This renames the LLDB error class to Status, as discussed
on the lldb-dev mailing list.
A change of this magnitude cannot easily be done without
find and replace, but that has potential to catch unwanted
occurrences of common strings such as "Error". Every effort
was made to find all the obvious things such as the word "Error"
appearing in a string, etc, but it's possible there are still
some lingering occurences left around. Hopefully nothing too
serious.
llvm-svn: 302872
diff --git a/lldb/source/Core/ValueObjectDynamicValue.cpp b/lldb/source/Core/ValueObjectDynamicValue.cpp
index 59bbc02..bb39caa 100644
--- a/lldb/source/Core/ValueObjectDynamicValue.cpp
+++ b/lldb/source/Core/ValueObjectDynamicValue.cpp
@@ -20,9 +20,9 @@
#include "lldb/Target/Process.h"
#include "lldb/Target/Target.h"
#include "lldb/Utility/DataExtractor.h" // for DataExtractor
-#include "lldb/Utility/Error.h" // for Error
#include "lldb/Utility/Log.h"
#include "lldb/Utility/Logging.h" // for GetLogIfAllCategoriesSet
+#include "lldb/Utility/Status.h" // for Status
#include "lldb/lldb-types.h" // for addr_t, offset_t
#include <string.h> // for strcmp, size_t
@@ -275,7 +275,7 @@
bool ValueObjectDynamicValue::IsInScope() { return m_parent->IsInScope(); }
bool ValueObjectDynamicValue::SetValueFromCString(const char *value_str,
- Error &error) {
+ Status &error) {
if (!UpdateValueIfNeeded(false)) {
error.SetErrorString("unable to read value");
return false;
@@ -310,7 +310,7 @@
return ret_val;
}
-bool ValueObjectDynamicValue::SetData(DataExtractor &data, Error &error) {
+bool ValueObjectDynamicValue::SetData(DataExtractor &data, Status &error) {
if (!UpdateValueIfNeeded(false)) {
error.SetErrorString("unable to read value");
return false;