Provide a test case for PR6629.
llvm-svn: 98702
diff --git a/clang/test/SemaCXX/class.cpp b/clang/test/SemaCXX/class.cpp
index 743983c..508ca4d 100644
--- a/clang/test/SemaCXX/class.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/SemaCXX/class.cpp
@@ -118,3 +118,21 @@
void S::f() {} // expected-error {{class member cannot be redeclared}} expected-note {{previous declaration}} expected-note {{previous definition}}
void f() {} // expected-error {{class member cannot be redeclared}} expected-error {{redefinition}}
};
+
+// Don't crash on this bogus code.
+namespace pr6629 {
+ // TODO: most of these errors are spurious
+ template<class T1, class T2> struct foo :
+ bogus<foo<T1,T2> > // expected-error {{unknown template name 'bogus'}} \
+ // BOGUS expected-error {{expected '{' after base class list}} \
+ // BOGUS expected-error {{expected ';' after struct}} \
+ // BOGUS expected-error {{expected unqualified-id}} \
+ { };
+
+ template<> struct foo<unknown,unknown> { // why isn't there an error here?
+ template <typename U1, typename U2> struct bar {
+ typedef bar type;
+ static const int value = 0;
+ };
+ };
+}