Halve the constexpr recursion depth in this test in an attempt to make the
freebsd bots happy. In the longer term, we should have a mechanism for moving
constexpr recursion off the call stack, to support the default limit of 512
suggested by the standard.
llvm-svn: 146596
diff --git a/clang/test/CXX/expr/expr.const/p2-0x.cpp b/clang/test/CXX/expr/expr.const/p2-0x.cpp
index dcb4bf4..2e5e7f2 100644
--- a/clang/test/CXX/expr/expr.const/p2-0x.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/CXX/expr/expr.const/p2-0x.cpp
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -std=c++11 -pedantic -verify -fcxx-exceptions %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -std=c++11 -pedantic -verify -fcxx-exceptions %s -fconstexpr-depth 256
// A conditional-expression is a core constant expression unless it involves one
// of the following as a potentially evaluated subexpression [...]:
@@ -95,11 +95,11 @@
// exceed the implementation-defined recursion limits (see Annex B);
namespace RecursionLimits {
constexpr int RecurseForever(int n) {
- return n + RecurseForever(n+1); // expected-note {{constexpr evaluation exceeded maximum depth of 512 calls}}
+ return n + RecurseForever(n+1); // expected-note {{constexpr evaluation exceeded maximum depth of 256 calls}}
}
struct AlsoRecurseForever {
constexpr AlsoRecurseForever(int n) :
- n(AlsoRecurseForever(n+1).n) // expected-note {{constexpr evaluation exceeded maximum depth of 512 calls}}
+ n(AlsoRecurseForever(n+1).n) // expected-note {{constexpr evaluation exceeded maximum depth of 256 calls}}
{}
int n;
};