The Redeclarable part of named decls is read before their name.
Lookup can nevertheless find them due to the serialized lookup table.
For instance when reading a template decl's templatedDecl, it will search for existing decls that it could be a redeclaration of, and find the half-read template decl.
Thus there is no point in asserting the names of decls.
llvm-svn: 164932
diff --git a/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReader.cpp b/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReader.cpp
index 1729668..639ef93 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReader.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReader.cpp
@@ -4950,8 +4950,10 @@
continue;
if (ND->getDeclName() != This->Name) {
- assert(!This->Name.getCXXNameType().isNull() &&
- "Name mismatch without a type");
+ // A name might be null because the decl's redeclarable part is
+ // currently read before reading its name. The lookup is triggered by
+ // building that decl (likely indirectly), and so it is later in the
+ // sense of "already existing" and can be ignored here.
continue;
}