Roll back the changes I made in r193907 which created a new Frame
pure virtual base class and made StackFrame a subclass of that. As
I started to build on top of that arrangement today, I found that it
wasn't working out like I intended. Instead I'll try sticking with
the single StackFrame class -- there's too much code duplication to
make a more complicated class hierarchy sensible I think.
llvm-svn: 193983
diff --git a/lldb/source/Target/ThreadPlanStepOverRange.cpp b/lldb/source/Target/ThreadPlanStepOverRange.cpp
index 5c7e460..2d8108b 100644
--- a/lldb/source/Target/ThreadPlanStepOverRange.cpp
+++ b/lldb/source/Target/ThreadPlanStepOverRange.cpp
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@
// start function really is our start function...
for(uint32_t i = 1;; ++i)
{
- FrameSP older_frame_sp = m_thread.GetStackFrameAtIndex(i);
+ StackFrameSP older_frame_sp = m_thread.GetStackFrameAtIndex(i);
if (!older_frame_sp) {
// We can't unwind the next frame we should just get out of here & stop...
break;
@@ -192,7 +192,7 @@
if (m_addr_context.line_entry.IsValid())
{
SymbolContext sc;
- FrameSP frame_sp = m_thread.GetStackFrameAtIndex(0);
+ StackFrameSP frame_sp = m_thread.GetStackFrameAtIndex(0);
sc = frame_sp->GetSymbolContext (eSymbolContextEverything);
if (sc.line_entry.IsValid())
{
@@ -357,7 +357,7 @@
if (log)
log->Printf ("ThreadPlanStepInRange::DoWillResume: adjusting range to the frame at inlined depth %d.",
m_thread.GetCurrentInlinedDepth());
- FrameSP stack_sp = m_thread.GetStackFrameAtIndex(0);
+ StackFrameSP stack_sp = m_thread.GetStackFrameAtIndex(0);
if (stack_sp)
{
Block *frame_block = stack_sp->GetFrameBlock();