Fix our semantic analysis of
unqualified-id '('
in C++. The unqualified-id might not refer to any declaration in our
current scope, but declarations by that name might be found via
argument-dependent lookup. We now do so properly.
As part of this change, CXXDependentNameExpr, which was previously
designed to express the unqualified-id in the above constructor within
templates, has become UnresolvedFunctionNameExpr, which does
effectively the same thing but will work for both templates and
non-templates.
Additionally, we cope with all unqualified-ids, since ADL also applies
in cases like
operator+(x, y)
llvm-svn: 63733
12 files changed
tree: 73af2a895cd623e0261648fcb2cb3d7c31e9c9ee
- clang/
- llvm/