Fix our semantic analysis of
unqualified-id '('
in C++. The unqualified-id might not refer to any declaration in our
current scope, but declarations by that name might be found via
argument-dependent lookup. We now do so properly.
As part of this change, CXXDependentNameExpr, which was previously
designed to express the unqualified-id in the above constructor within
templates, has become UnresolvedFunctionNameExpr, which does
effectively the same thing but will work for both templates and
non-templates.
Additionally, we cope with all unqualified-ids, since ADL also applies
in cases like
operator+(x, y)
llvm-svn: 63733
diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp
index e9dbc84..2a7c9a8 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
DeclarationName ConvName
= Context.DeclarationNames.getCXXConversionFunctionName(ConvTypeCanon);
return ActOnDeclarationNameExpr(S, OperatorLoc, ConvName, HasTrailingLParen,
- &SS, /*ForceRes*/false, isAddressOfOperand);
+ &SS, isAddressOfOperand);
}
/// ActOnCXXOperatorFunctionIdExpr - Parse a C++ overloaded operator
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@
bool isAddressOfOperand) {
DeclarationName Name = Context.DeclarationNames.getCXXOperatorName(Op);
return ActOnDeclarationNameExpr(S, OperatorLoc, Name, HasTrailingLParen, &SS,
- /*ForceRes*/false, isAddressOfOperand);
+ isAddressOfOperand);
}
/// ActOnCXXTypeidOfType - Parse typeid( type-id ).