Fix our semantic analysis of
unqualified-id '('
in C++. The unqualified-id might not refer to any declaration in our
current scope, but declarations by that name might be found via
argument-dependent lookup. We now do so properly.
As part of this change, CXXDependentNameExpr, which was previously
designed to express the unqualified-id in the above constructor within
templates, has become UnresolvedFunctionNameExpr, which does
effectively the same thing but will work for both templates and
non-templates.
Additionally, we cope with all unqualified-ids, since ADL also applies
in cases like
operator+(x, y)
llvm-svn: 63733
diff --git a/clang/test/SemaCXX/conversion-function.cpp b/clang/test/SemaCXX/conversion-function.cpp
index 17e73bc..f9dd600 100644
--- a/clang/test/SemaCXX/conversion-function.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/SemaCXX/conversion-function.cpp
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
}
float g() {
- return operator float(); // expected-error{{use of undeclared 'operator float'}}
+ return operator float(); // expected-error{{no matching function for call to 'operator float'}}
}
};