When we see a 'template' disambiguator that marks the next identifier
(or operator-function-id) as a template, but the context is actually
non-dependent or the current instantiation, allow us to use knowledge
of what kind of template it is, e.g., type template vs. function
template, for further syntactic disambiguation. This allows us to
parse properly in the presence of stray "template" keywords, which is
necessary in C++0x and it's good recovery in C++98/03.
llvm-svn: 106167
diff --git a/clang/test/SemaTemplate/nested-name-spec-template.cpp b/clang/test/SemaTemplate/nested-name-spec-template.cpp
index 0251894..e1e7246 100644
--- a/clang/test/SemaTemplate/nested-name-spec-template.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/SemaTemplate/nested-name-spec-template.cpp
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
M::Promote<int>::type *ret_intptr3(int* ip) { return ip; }
M::template Promote<int>::type *ret_intptr4(int* ip) { return ip; } // expected-warning{{'template' keyword outside of a template}}
+ M::template Promote<int> pi; // expected-warning{{'template' keyword outside of a template}}
}
N::M::Promote<int>::type *ret_intptr5(int* ip) { return ip; }