[Sema] Updated note for address spaces to print the type.

This allows to reuse the same diagnostic for OpenCL or CUDA.

llvm-svn: 335358
diff --git a/clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td b/clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
index 454aa53..b7ede85 100644
--- a/clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
+++ b/clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
@@ -3683,8 +3683,8 @@
     "%select{%ordinal4 argument|object argument}3">;
 def note_ovl_candidate_bad_addrspace : Note<
     "candidate %sub{select_ovl_candidate_kind}0,1,2 not viable: "
-    "%select{%ordinal7|'this'}6 argument (%3) is in "
-    "address space %4, but parameter must be in address space %5">;
+    "address space mismatch in %select{%ordinal6|'this'}5 argument (%3), "
+    "parameter type must be %4">;
 def note_ovl_candidate_bad_gc : Note<
     "candidate %sub{select_ovl_candidate_kind}0,1,2 not viable: "
     "%select{%ordinal7|'this'}6 argument (%3) has %select{no|__weak|__strong}4 "
diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp
index b1df8f6..34ac5c1 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp
@@ -9591,9 +9591,7 @@
       S.Diag(Fn->getLocation(), diag::note_ovl_candidate_bad_addrspace)
           << (unsigned)FnKindPair.first << (unsigned)FnKindPair.second << FnDesc
           << (FromExpr ? FromExpr->getSourceRange() : SourceRange()) << FromTy
-          << FromQs.getAddressSpaceAttributePrintValue()
-          << ToQs.getAddressSpaceAttributePrintValue()
-          << (unsigned)isObjectArgument << I + 1;
+          << ToTy << (unsigned)isObjectArgument << I + 1;
       MaybeEmitInheritedConstructorNote(S, Cand->FoundDecl);
       return;
     }
diff --git a/clang/test/SemaCXX/address-space-references.cpp b/clang/test/SemaCXX/address-space-references.cpp
index f5a63d2..5c297e7 100644
--- a/clang/test/SemaCXX/address-space-references.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/SemaCXX/address-space-references.cpp
@@ -3,10 +3,10 @@
 typedef int __attribute__((address_space(1))) int_1;
 typedef int __attribute__((address_space(2))) int_2;
 
-void f0(int_1 &); // expected-note{{candidate function not viable: 1st argument ('int') is in address space 0, but parameter must be in address space 1}} \
-// expected-note{{candidate function not viable: 1st argument ('int_2' (aka '__attribute__((address_space(2))) int')) is in address space 2, but parameter must be in address space 1}}
-void f0(const int_1 &); // expected-note{{candidate function not viable: 1st argument ('int') is in address space 0, but parameter must be in address space 1}} \
-// expected-note{{candidate function not viable: 1st argument ('int_2' (aka '__attribute__((address_space(2))) int')) is in address space 2, but parameter must be in address space 1}}
+void f0(int_1 &); // expected-note{{candidate function not viable: address space mismatch in 1st argument ('int'), parameter type must be 'int_1 &' (aka '__attribute__((address_space(1))) int &')}} \
+// expected-note{{candidate function not viable: address space mismatch in 1st argument ('int_2' (aka '__attribute__((address_space(2))) int')), parameter type must be 'int_1 &' (aka '__attribute__((address_space(1))) int &')}}
+void f0(const int_1 &); // expected-note{{candidate function not viable: address space mismatch in 1st argument ('int'), parameter type must be 'const int_1 &' (aka 'const __attribute__((address_space(1))) int &')}} \
+// expected-note{{candidate function not viable: address space mismatch in 1st argument ('int_2' (aka '__attribute__((address_space(2))) int')), parameter type must be 'const int_1 &' (aka 'const __attribute__((address_space(1))) int &')}}
 
 void test_f0() {
   int i;