PR15132: Replace "address expression must be an lvalue or a function
designator" diagnostic with more correct and more human-friendly "cannot take
address of rvalue of type 'T'".
For the case of & &T::f, provide a custom diagnostic, rather than unhelpfully
saying "cannot take address of rvalue of type '<overloaded function type>'".
For the case of &array_temporary, treat it just like a class temporary
(including allowing it as an extension); the existing diagnostic wording
for the class temporary case works fine.
llvm-svn: 174262
diff --git a/clang/test/CodeGenCXX/cxx0x-initializer-array.cpp b/clang/test/CodeGenCXX/cxx0x-initializer-array.cpp
index 73bbca1..3144e94 100644
--- a/clang/test/CodeGenCXX/cxx0x-initializer-array.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/CodeGenCXX/cxx0x-initializer-array.cpp
@@ -53,6 +53,7 @@
struct S { S(); ~S(); };
using T = S[3];
void f(const T &);
+ void f(T *);
// CHECK: define void @_ZN10array_dtor1gEv(
void g() {
// CHECK: %[[ARRAY:.*]] = alloca [3 x
@@ -68,10 +69,9 @@
// Destruct loop.
// CHECK: call void @_ZN10array_dtor1SD1Ev(
// CHECK: br i1
+ f(T{});
// CHECK: ret void
-
- f(T{});
}
// CHECK: define void @_ZN10array_dtor1hEv(
void h() {
@@ -91,4 +91,21 @@
// CHECK: ret void
}
+ // CHECK: define void @_ZN10array_dtor1iEv(
+ void i() {
+ // CHECK: %[[ARRAY:.*]] = alloca [3 x
+ // CHECK: br
+
+ // CHECK: call void @_ZN10array_dtor1SC1Ev(
+ // CHECK: br i1
+
+ // CHECK: call void @_ZN10array_dtor1fEPA3_NS_1SE(
+ // CHECK: br
+
+ // CHECK: call void @_ZN10array_dtor1SD1Ev(
+ // CHECK: br i1
+ f(&T{});
+
+ // CHECK: ret void
+ }
}