[X86] Use 'unsigned' instead of 'unsigned int' for consistency in the X86 portion of Host.cpp.

llvm-svn: 307463
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Support/Host.cpp b/llvm/lib/Support/Host.cpp
index 0b5a5c1..9fbdb8b 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Support/Host.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Support/Host.cpp
@@ -526,8 +526,8 @@
 }
 
 static void
-getIntelProcessorTypeAndSubtype(unsigned int Family, unsigned int Model,
-                                unsigned int Brand_id, unsigned int Features,
+getIntelProcessorTypeAndSubtype(unsigned Family, unsigned Model,
+                                unsigned Brand_id, unsigned Features,
                                 unsigned *Type, unsigned *Subtype) {
   if (Brand_id != 0)
     return;
@@ -827,9 +827,9 @@
   }
 }
 
-static void getAMDProcessorTypeAndSubtype(unsigned int Family,
-                                          unsigned int Model,
-                                          unsigned int Features,
+static void getAMDProcessorTypeAndSubtype(unsigned Family,
+                                          unsigned Model,
+                                          unsigned Features,
                                           unsigned *Type,
                                           unsigned *Subtype) {
   // FIXME: this poorly matches the generated SubtargetFeatureKV table.  There
@@ -956,10 +956,10 @@
   }
 }
 
-static unsigned getAvailableFeatures(unsigned int ECX, unsigned int EDX,
+static unsigned getAvailableFeatures(unsigned ECX, unsigned EDX,
                                      unsigned MaxLeaf) {
   unsigned Features = 0;
-  unsigned int EAX, EBX;
+  unsigned EAX, EBX;
   Features |= (((EDX >> 23) & 1) << FEATURE_MMX);
   Features |= (((EDX >> 25) & 1) << FEATURE_SSE);
   Features |= (((EDX >> 26) & 1) << FEATURE_SSE2);