[C++11] Add range based accessors for the Use-Def chain of a Value.

This requires a number of steps.
1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation
   detail
2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User*
   iterator.
3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the
   Use to the User.
4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs.
5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users().
6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether
   they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when
   needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally
   opaque.

Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the
Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and
switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the
renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make
any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would
touch all of the same lies of code.

The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice
regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s
rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits
a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird
extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have.
I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms
a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into
another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right
move.

However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up
a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =]

llvm-svn: 203364
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/NVPTX/NVPTXLowerAggrCopies.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/NVPTX/NVPTXLowerAggrCopies.cpp
index 7385e8f..f0c3663 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/NVPTX/NVPTXLowerAggrCopies.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/NVPTX/NVPTXLowerAggrCopies.cpp
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@
         if (DL->getTypeStoreSize(load->getType()) < MaxAggrCopySize)
           continue;
 
-        User *use = *(load->use_begin());
+        User *use = load->user_back();
         if (StoreInst *store = dyn_cast<StoreInst>(use)) {
           if (store->getOperand(0) != load) //getValueOperand
             continue;
@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@
   //
   for (unsigned i = 0, e = aggrLoads.size(); i != e; ++i) {
     LoadInst *load = aggrLoads[i];
-    StoreInst *store = dyn_cast<StoreInst>(*load->use_begin());
+    StoreInst *store = dyn_cast<StoreInst>(*load->user_begin());
     Value *srcAddr = load->getOperand(0);
     Value *dstAddr = store->getOperand(1);
     unsigned numLoads = DL->getTypeStoreSize(load->getType());