Revert r172285 (suppressing a 'redundant' -Wc++98-compat warning) and add a
testcase for a situation it caused us to miss.
llvm-svn: 173540
diff --git a/clang/test/SemaCXX/cxx98-compat.cpp b/clang/test/SemaCXX/cxx98-compat.cpp
index ca32c19..7d36770 100644
--- a/clang/test/SemaCXX/cxx98-compat.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/SemaCXX/cxx98-compat.cpp
@@ -109,7 +109,9 @@
// expected-warning@-1 {{range-based for loop is incompatible with C++98}}
// expected-warning@-2 {{'auto' type specifier is incompatible with C++98}}
// expected-warning@-3 {{initialization of initializer_list object is incompatible with C++98}}
+ // expected-warning@-4 {{reference initialized from initializer list is incompatible with C++98}}
}
+ struct Agg { int a, b; } const &agg = { 1, 2 }; // expected-warning {{reference initialized from initializer list is incompatible with C++98}}
}
struct InClassInit {