Fixed spelling mistake in comments of LLVM Analysis passes
Patch by Reshabh Sharma!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43861
llvm-svn: 326352
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Analysis/CGSCCPassManager.cpp b/llvm/lib/Analysis/CGSCCPassManager.cpp
index ceff947..62e3dfc 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Analysis/CGSCCPassManager.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Analysis/CGSCCPassManager.cpp
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@
using namespace llvm;
-// Explicit template instantiations and specialization defininitions for core
+// Explicit template instantiations and specialization definitions for core
// template typedefs.
namespace llvm {
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@
// ...getContext().yield();
}
- // Invaliadtion was handled after each pass in the above loop for the current
+ // Invalidation was handled after each pass in the above loop for the current
// SCC. Therefore, the remaining analysis results in the AnalysisManager are
// preserved. We mark this with a set so that we don't need to inspect each
// one individually.
@@ -372,7 +372,7 @@
// We need to propagate an invalidation call to all but the newly current SCC
// because the outer pass manager won't do that for us after splitting them.
// FIXME: We should accept a PreservedAnalysis from the CG updater so that if
- // there are preserved ananalyses we can avoid invalidating them here for
+ // there are preserved analysis we can avoid invalidating them here for
// split-off SCCs.
// We know however that this will preserve any FAM proxy so go ahead and mark
// that.
@@ -635,7 +635,7 @@
// If one of the invalidated SCCs had a cached proxy to a function
// analysis manager, we need to create a proxy in the new current SCC as
- // the invaliadted SCCs had their functions moved.
+ // the invalidated SCCs had their functions moved.
if (HasFunctionAnalysisProxy)
AM.getResult<FunctionAnalysisManagerCGSCCProxy>(*C, G);