PR19729: Delete a bunch of bogus code in Sema::FindAllocationOverload. This
caused us to perform copy-initialization for the parameters of an allocation
function called by a new-expression multiple times, resulting in us rejecting
allocations that passed non-copyable parameters (and much worse things in
MSVC compat mode, where we potentially called this function multiple times).
llvm-svn: 208724
diff --git a/clang/test/SemaCXX/microsoft-new-delete.cpp b/clang/test/SemaCXX/microsoft-new-delete.cpp
index e0d25dc..6c9be22 100644
--- a/clang/test/SemaCXX/microsoft-new-delete.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/SemaCXX/microsoft-new-delete.cpp
@@ -1,5 +1,4 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fms-compatibility -fsyntax-only -verify %s
-// expected-no-diagnostics
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fms-compatibility -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++11 %s
#include <stddef.h>
@@ -10,3 +9,26 @@
// Expect no error in MSVC compatibility mode
int *p = new(arbitrary) int[4];
}
+
+class noncopyable { noncopyable(const noncopyable&); } extern nc; // expected-note {{here}}
+void *operator new[](size_t, noncopyable);
+void *operator new(size_t, const noncopyable&);
+void *q = new (nc) int[4]; // expected-error {{calling a private constructor}}
+
+struct bitfield { int n : 3; } bf; // expected-note {{here}}
+void *operator new[](size_t, int &);
+void *operator new(size_t, const int &);
+void *r = new (bf.n) int[4]; // expected-error {{non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field}}
+
+struct base {};
+struct derived : private base {} der; // expected-note {{here}}
+void *operator new[](size_t, base &);
+void *operator new(size_t, derived &);
+void *s = new (der) int[4]; // expected-error {{private}}
+
+struct explicit_ctor { explicit explicit_ctor(int); };
+struct explicit_ctor_tag {} ect;
+void *operator new[](size_t, explicit_ctor_tag, explicit_ctor);
+void *operator new(size_t, explicit_ctor_tag, int);
+void *t = new (ect, 0) int[4];
+void *u = new (ect, {0}) int[4];