[clang-tidy] Function names configurable for cppcoreguidelines-nomalloc - checker

Summary:
Hello everybody,

this is an incremental patch for the NoMalloc-Checker I wrote. It allows to configure the memory-management functions, that are checked,
This might be helpful for a code base with custom functions in use, or non-standard functionality, like posix_memalign.

Reviewers: aaron.ballman, hokein, alexfh

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, alexfh

Subscribers: sbenza, nemanjai, JDevlieghere

Tags: #clang-tools-extra

Patch by Jonas Toth!

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28239

llvm-svn: 296734
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/NoMallocCheck.cpp b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/NoMallocCheck.cpp
index d747fca..eda8907 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/NoMallocCheck.cpp
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/cppcoreguidelines/NoMallocCheck.cpp
@@ -8,43 +8,63 @@
 //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
 
 #include "NoMallocCheck.h"
+#include "../utils/Matchers.h"
+#include "../utils/OptionsUtils.h"
 #include "clang/AST/ASTContext.h"
 #include "clang/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchFinder.h"
-#include <iostream>
+#include <algorithm>
 #include <string>
+#include <vector>
 
 using namespace clang::ast_matchers;
+using namespace clang::ast_matchers::internal;
 
 namespace clang {
 namespace tidy {
 namespace cppcoreguidelines {
 
+namespace {
+Matcher<FunctionDecl> hasAnyListedName(const std::string &FunctionNames) {
+  const std::vector<std::string> NameList =
+      utils::options::parseStringList(FunctionNames);
+  return hasAnyName(std::vector<StringRef>(NameList.begin(), NameList.end()));
+}
+}
+
+void NoMallocCheck::storeOptions(ClangTidyOptions::OptionMap &Opts) {
+  Options.store(Opts, "Allocations", AllocList);
+  Options.store(Opts, "Reallocations", ReallocList);
+  Options.store(Opts, "Deallocations", DeallocList);
+}
+
 void NoMallocCheck::registerMatchers(MatchFinder *Finder) {
   // C-style memory management is only problematic in C++.
   if (!getLangOpts().CPlusPlus)
     return;
 
   // Registering malloc, will suggest RAII.
-  Finder->addMatcher(
-      callExpr(callee(functionDecl(hasAnyName("::malloc", "::calloc"))))
-          .bind("aquisition"),
-      this);
+  Finder->addMatcher(callExpr(callee(functionDecl(hasAnyListedName(AllocList))))
+                         .bind("allocation"),
+                     this);
 
   // Registering realloc calls, suggest std::vector or std::string.
   Finder->addMatcher(
-      callExpr(callee(functionDecl(hasName("::realloc")))).bind("realloc"),
+      callExpr(callee(functionDecl(hasAnyListedName(ReallocList))))
+          .bind("realloc"),
       this);
 
   // Registering free calls, will suggest RAII instead.
   Finder->addMatcher(
-      callExpr(callee(functionDecl(hasName("::free")))).bind("free"), this);
+      callExpr(callee(functionDecl(hasAnyListedName(DeallocList))))
+          .bind("free"),
+      this);
 }
 
 void NoMallocCheck::check(const MatchFinder::MatchResult &Result) {
   const CallExpr *Call = nullptr;
   StringRef Recommendation;
 
-  if ((Call = Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<CallExpr>("aquisition")))
+  if ((Call = Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<CallExpr>("allocation")))
     Recommendation = "consider a container or a smart pointer";
   else if ((Call = Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<CallExpr>("realloc")))
     Recommendation = "consider std::vector or std::string";