[InstCombine] fold fadd+fneg with fdiv/fmul betweena
The backend already does this via isNegatibleForFree(),
but we may want to alter the fneg IR canonicalizations
that currently exist, so we need to try harder to fold
fneg in IR to avoid regressions.
llvm-svn: 367227
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineAddSub.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineAddSub.cpp
index 79d9ddd..328c502 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineAddSub.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineAddSub.cpp
@@ -1387,6 +1387,24 @@
if (match(&I, m_c_FAdd(m_FNeg(m_Value(X)), m_Value(Y))))
return BinaryOperator::CreateFSubFMF(Y, X, &I);
+ // Similar to above, but look through fmul/fdiv for the negated term.
+ // (-X * Y) + Z --> Z - (X * Y) [4 commuted variants]
+ Value *Z;
+ if (match(&I, m_c_FAdd(m_OneUse(m_c_FMul(m_FNeg(m_Value(X)), m_Value(Y))),
+ m_Value(Z)))) {
+ Value *XY = Builder.CreateFMulFMF(X, Y, &I);
+ return BinaryOperator::CreateFSubFMF(Z, XY, &I);
+ }
+ // (-X / Y) + Z --> Z - (X / Y) [2 commuted variants]
+ // (X / -Y) + Z --> Z - (X / Y) [2 commuted variants]
+ if (match(&I, m_c_FAdd(m_OneUse(m_FDiv(m_FNeg(m_Value(X)), m_Value(Y))),
+ m_Value(Z))) ||
+ match(&I, m_c_FAdd(m_OneUse(m_FDiv(m_Value(X), m_FNeg(m_Value(Y)))),
+ m_Value(Z)))) {
+ Value *XY = Builder.CreateFDivFMF(X, Y, &I);
+ return BinaryOperator::CreateFSubFMF(Z, XY, &I);
+ }
+
// Check for (fadd double (sitofp x), y), see if we can merge this into an
// integer add followed by a promotion.
Value *LHS = I.getOperand(0), *RHS = I.getOperand(1);